Is percutaneous access superior to cutdown access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? A meta-analysis

Bi, Guoshan; Wang, Quanwen; Xiong, Guozuo; Chen, Jie; Luo, Dongyang; Deng, Jiangbei; Qin, Xiao

doi:10.1177/17085381211032765

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

(136 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The safety and efficacy of using SMCD in total percutaneous EVAR have been reported in several multicenter randomized studies and meta-analysis. 14-18 To this end, the SMCD failure rate of the present study adds to this experience and reports a similar overall SMCD failure rate. That said, the use of SMCD is safe at low conversion rates.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

Analysis of Determinants for Suture-mediated Closure Device Failure During EVAR Procedures

Garabet,

Arnautovic,

Meurer

et al. 2023

Vasc Endovascular Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for elective and emergency infrarenal aortic pathologies is the primary approach for treatment nowadays. During such procedure, the suture-mediated closure device (SMCD) (Perclose ProGlideTM, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA) is commonly used. This study aimed to identify potential contributors for SMCD failure in a patient cohort of elective and emergency EVAR. Methods Archived medical records from patients who underwent EVAR for aortic pathologies in elective and emergency setting at the University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany were included. Patient’s co-morbidities, access vessel morphologies and hemostasis-related blood parameters were evaluated on their association with SMCD failure applying different statistical methods. Results A total of 71 patients (139 femoral accesses) was included. The mean age was 73.5 ± 8.4 years. Overall SMCD failure rate was 4.3%, 4.1% for elective and 5.9% for emergency cases, respectively. Total procedure time was longer for the SMCD failure group (323 ± 117.8 min vs 171 ± 43.7 min). The calcification status of the common femoral artery (CFA), the diameter of the aortic bifurcation, and dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) on the medication plan prior to the procedure were associated with SMCD failure. Univariate binary logistic regression analysis nominated several potentially relevant predictors for SMCD failure who underwent subsequent multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. Here, DAPT on the medication plan was identified as being promising in predicting SMCD failure (OR 30.5), while anterior plaque formation in the CFA maintained as only statistically relevant determinant (OR 44.9). Conclusions This study confirms the CFA calcification status to be associated with SMCD failure. Although discontinued prior to endovascular treatment, DAPT was also found to be associated with SMCD failure. Our results may advocate to perform obligatory platelet testing prior to EVAR to maximize patient safety.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%