2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the available data and the foreseeable increase in PSMA PET use before primary treatment, it stands to reason that future inclusion of PSMA PET within the main international guidelines can be expected, at least in a setting of high-risk PCa at disease presentation. Moreover, a cost-effectiveness analysis developed using data from the proPSMA study demonstrated greater accuracy and lower direct comparative costs for PSMA PET than for conventional imaging, namely CT and bone scanning (28).…”
Section: Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the available data and the foreseeable increase in PSMA PET use before primary treatment, it stands to reason that future inclusion of PSMA PET within the main international guidelines can be expected, at least in a setting of high-risk PCa at disease presentation. Moreover, a cost-effectiveness analysis developed using data from the proPSMA study demonstrated greater accuracy and lower direct comparative costs for PSMA PET than for conventional imaging, namely CT and bone scanning (28).…”
Section: Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cost-effectiveness analysis was recently conducted using data from the proPSMA trial [4] . From an Australian societal perspective, PSMA PET is the dominant strategy, with both better accuracy and lower costs, compared to the standard of care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this case Australia’s regulatory policies have clearly allowed the advantage of early adoption and widespread access of a valuable diagnostic modality. In a cost-effectiveness analysis of the proPSMA study, PSMA PET was modeled to be more cost effective than CT and bone scans in the Australian setting ( 17 ). Similarly, in Germany, a permissive regulatory environment has fostered an environment favoring innovation in PSMA based theranostics, however, there is variable access to these agents both by indication and by jurisdiction ( 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%