2021
DOI: 10.1123/jsm.2019-0375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Reflexivity Enough? Addressing Reflexive Embodiment, Power, and Whiteness in Sport Management Research

Abstract: In this article, the authors drew from the epistemological and methodological considerations of neighboring social science fields (i.e., counseling psychology, education, sociology, and women’s studies), which suggest a reevaluation of reflexive research practice(s). In discussing the implications this reevaluation may have for future sport management research, the authors contend that such dialogue may encourage scholars to understand that, while adopting a reflexive approach is good research practice, it may… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Eastman and Billings (2001) write, "If much of the shorthand of sportstalk contains hidden racial/ ethnic and gender biases, making such covert practices salient may, it is hoped, influence SBM 12,3 public policy, journalist mores, and social pressure to eliminate such unwitting prejudice" (p. 185). As white, queer women researchers, we embrace the obligation to interrogate and disrupt white supremacy in sport management research (McGarry, 2019;Vadeboncoeur et al, 2021) and sports broadly.…”
Section: Spirit Of the Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Eastman and Billings (2001) write, "If much of the shorthand of sportstalk contains hidden racial/ ethnic and gender biases, making such covert practices salient may, it is hoped, influence SBM 12,3 public policy, journalist mores, and social pressure to eliminate such unwitting prejudice" (p. 185). As white, queer women researchers, we embrace the obligation to interrogate and disrupt white supremacy in sport management research (McGarry, 2019;Vadeboncoeur et al, 2021) and sports broadly.…”
Section: Spirit Of the Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, research has historically been used to justify dehumanising, and oppressive policies and practices 3,25 . Therefore, when non‐Indigenous researchers are working in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, they need to work in a self‐reflective manner, to be aware of biases shaped by dominant ways of knowing and engage in ongoing critical reflection 24,27–29 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential ethical questions on the methodology have been reflected on intensively so that the observation fully meets the requirements of the university's ethical research standards (Brannick & Coghlan, 2007;McLain & Kim, 2018;Primecz, 2020;Soderberg, 2020;Vadeboncoeur, Bopp & Singer, 2020). The observation raised ethical questions, as it was not revealed to the participants of the meetings that I was taking the role of a researcher so as not to disturb the professional flow of the meeting or influence the participants in their business decision because they felt observed (McLain & Kim, 2018).…”
Section: Observation Of Professional Pre-merger Explorative Workhopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, reflexive awareness is important to reflect on the personal stakes involved and potential bias or emotional involvement. Self-awareness and transparency are essential, and every researcher needs to define their own suitable activities to ensure them (Brannick & Coghlan, 2007;Johnson, Adkins & Chauvin, 2020;Luttrell, 2019;Primecz, 2020;Reyes, 2020;Soderberg, 2020;Vadeboncoeur et al, 2020). The interplay between the researcher and the organisation is essential for qualitative insider research and provides insightful contextual understanding.…”
Section: Reflexive Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation