Is the Goligher classification a valid tool in clinical practice and research for hemorrhoidal disease?

Abstract

Background The most widely used classification for hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the Goligher classification, which ranks presence and severity of prolapse in four grades. Since physicians base this gradation on medical history and physical examination, it might be prone to interobserver variability. Furthermore, the gradation impacts the treatment of choice which makes reproducibility of utmost importance. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver variability of Goligher classification among surgeons in the Netherlands. Methods A single-choice survey was used. The first part consisted of questions concerning baseline characteristics and the use of the Goligher classification in routine clinical practice. In the second part, to assess interobserver variability, we asked gastrointestinal surgeons and residents who routinely treat HD to review 25 photographs (with given timing as during rest or push) of patients with HD and classify the gradation using the Goligher classification. The survey was sent by email on April 19, 2021 and was available online until July 5, 2021. Interobserver variability was assessed using Fleiss’ Kappa test. Results A total of 329 gastrointestinal surgeons, fellows and residents were sent an invitation email, of whom 95 (29%) completed the survey. Among the respondents, 87% indicated that they use the Goligher classification in clinical practice. Eighty-one percent found the classification helpful and 63% classified HD according to Goligher and followed the guidelines for treatment of HD accordingly. The interobserver variability showed an overall fair strength of agreement, with a Fleiss’ Kappa (κ) of 0.376 (95% CI 0.373–0.380). There was a moderate agreement for grade I and IV HD with a κ statistic of 0.466 and 0.522, respectively. For grades II and III, there was a lower (fair) strength of agreement with 0.206 and 0.378, respectively. Conclusions The fair interobserver variability is disappointing and demonstrates the need for a more reliable, and internationally accepted, classification for HD. A new classification should enable more uniformity in treating HD and in comparing outcomes of future trials and prospective registries. The protocol for a Delphi study for a new classification system is currently being prepared and led by an international research group.

Preliminary Results of the First 50 Patients Undergoing Sclerotherapy for II-Degree Hemorrhoidal Disease Using an Automated Device

“…Historically, HD has been classified according to the Goligher classification, even though this last one is, today, considered incomplete, and it requires other methods of grouping ( 3 ). However, the choice of treatment today, going from conservative to surgical ones, is guided on the severity of disease presentation and related symptomatology.…”

Correlation Between Poor Defecation Habits and Postoperative Hemorrhoid Recurrence

“…The Goligher classification is the most widely used classification for HD. Surgical management was performed based on the Goligher Classification of hemorrhoids (19), the type of health insurance patient's choice. Patients with bleeding hemorrhoids underwent either Hemorrhoid injection sclerotherapy (IS)or rubber band ligation (RBL), which was performed either in the treatment room using 1% lidocaine as a local anesthetic or in the operation theater under spinal anesthesia.…”

Management and Treatment of External Hemorrhoidal Thrombosis

“…There is neither a classification nor a consensus agreement for evaluating the presence and severity of EHT. For this reason, the choice of the type of treatment remains controversial ( 7 ).…”