2014
DOI: 10.3109/0886022x.2014.926771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the red cell distribution width strong predictor for treatment response in primary glomerulonephritides?

Abstract: Background: Novel biomarkers are needed to predict the response to treatment in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) due to primary glomerulonephritides (PGN). We aimed to test the predictive value of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) for estimation of response to therapy in adult patients with NS. Study design, setting & participants, and intervention: We performed a prospective study including 176 patients with NS due to PGN. Patients were divided into three groups according to their response to the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chronic renal failure patients may experience systemic damage as time goes on until terminal stage of renal failure which requires CRRT treatment [5][6][7][8][9][10]. The disease causes a series of adverse drug reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronic renal failure patients may experience systemic damage as time goes on until terminal stage of renal failure which requires CRRT treatment [5][6][7][8][9][10]. The disease causes a series of adverse drug reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of our study also indicate that the predictive value of RDW mainly may be attributable to the inflammatory microenvironment in patients with diabetes who have GN. Another study has suggested that baseline RDW value is also a promising novel biomarker for predicting response to treatment in adult patients with nephrotic syndrome due to primary glomerulonephritides [ 31 ], which further underscores the clinical significance of RDW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finalmente, si consideramos al RDW como un nuevo biomarcador y factor de riesgo, este debe cumplir una serie de requisitos para ser reconocido como tal dentro de los cuales podemos mencionar la capacidad de reflejar la magnitud del proceso medido, modificarse por efecto de las terapias, tener una metodología bien definida para su determinación y entregar información diagnóstica y pronóstica que pueda ser usada en la estratificación de riesgo de pacientes con ECV y adicionalmente, establecer una causalidad que sea independiente de otros factores confusores presentes 58 . Aunque existe resultados robustos en muchas de estas características anteriormente descritas, futuros estudios deben focalizarse, por ejemplo, en la evaluación del RDW y su potencial capacidad de modificarse por el uso de terapias, la cual ha sido estudiado preliminarmente 59 .…”
Section: Limitaciones Del Rdw En La Práctica Clínicaunclassified