2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there still need for microelectrode recording now the subthalamic nucleus can be well visualized with high field and ultrahigh MR imaging?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology and a better understanding of the relationship between an MRI and MER, MER evaluation remains the most widely used localization technique [3], [4]. The MER provides a high temporal resolution (< 1 ms) of the brain's neural activity in the close vicinity to the microelectrode [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology and a better understanding of the relationship between an MRI and MER, MER evaluation remains the most widely used localization technique [3], [4]. The MER provides a high temporal resolution (< 1 ms) of the brain's neural activity in the close vicinity to the microelectrode [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 However, even with the best available imaging techniques for displaying brain anatomy in vivo, the peri-STN area is still poorly visualized. 25,30,46,49 Several approaches have been described to optimize STN targeting. DBS centers predominantly use the con-cept of a "2-stage method" for accurate and clinically effective positioning of electrodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Reck et al calculated the central trajectory implantation rate to be 73% in 22 patients with PD when DBS of the STN was performed (19). In our previous study, we reported a central trajectory implantation rate of ~70% using a combination of direct and indirect targeting methods (14). Toda et al reported that the implant rate of permanent DBS electrodes to the central trajectory was 81% in their series in which a 3T MRI machine was used.…”
Section: A B C Dmentioning
confidence: 93%