Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and the learning effect of an isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol designed to simultaneously assess trunk muscle strength and endurance. In addition, the effect of the participants' sex on the reliability data was examined. Methods Fifty-seven healthy and physically active young men ( n = 28) and women ( n = 29) performed the isokinetic protocol 5 times, separated by a week between each of the first 4 sessions and by a month between the last 2 sessions. The protocol consisted of performing 4 trials of 15 maximum flexion–extension concentric exertions at 120°/s (range of trunk motion = 50°). The absolute and relative peak torque and total work were calculated to assess trunk flexion and extension strength. In addition, endurance ratio, modified endurance ratio, fatigue final ratio, recovery ratio, and modified recovery ratio variables were used for the assessment of trunk muscle endurance in both directions. Results Regarding the absolute reliability, no relevant changes were found between paired-comparison sessions for most strength and endurance variables, except for total work and relative total work variables in the flexion movement in both sexes. In addition, the typical error of the isokinetic variables was lower than 10% in both males and females, and minimum detectable changes ranged from 7% to 20%, with a tendency to be higher in females and in endurance variables. The strength variables showed high-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; >0.74); however, for the endurance variables only the endurance ratio and the modified endurance ratio obtained moderate-to-high ICC values (0.57 < ICC < 0.82). In addition, the analysis of the variance reported no significant differences between consecutive pairs of sessions for most variables in both sexes. Conclusion Overall, these findings provide clinicians, trainers, and researchers with a 10-min single-session protocol to perform a reliable muscle strength and endurance evaluation of trunk flexor and extensor muscles, all within the same protocol.

Patients With Becker Muscular Dystrophy Have Severe Paraspinal Muscle Involvement

“…We assessed trunk strength using Biodex Dual-position back Extension/Flexion attachment unit. Biodex is a consistent method to assess muscle strength and has shown to be a reliable method to measure trunk muscle strength (26). Muscle FF found in the paraspinal muscles was strongly and inversely associated with reduced muscle strength in trunk extension in participants with BMD.…”

Are Core Stability Tests Related to Single Leg Squat Performance in Active Females?

“…The relative reliability of the different measures was analysed using the ICC 2,1 , calculating 95% confidence limits (95% CL). The ICC values were categorised as follows: excellent (0.90 to 1.00), high (0.70 to 0.89), moderate (0.50 to 0.69), and low (<0.50) [ 42 ]. One-way repeated-measures ANOVAs were performed to assess the repetition effect, with the session as the within-subject factor (familiarisation and testing sessions).…”

Peak torque substantially varies between patients with non-specific low back pain; belong to directional preference classification, and healthy individuals—clinical biokinesiologic perspectives

“…Participants were instructed to keep their arms and hands crossed over their chest during measurements. The measurement protocol was strongly adopted by researchers in recent study 11) .…”

“…Trunk flexors and extensors strength is fundamental for enjoying satisfactory high quality spinal stability and mobility of the axial skeleton 10) . Isokinetic testing has been extensively reported in literature to study trunk muscles strength 11,12) . Peak torque of trunk muscles is one of the best outcome measurements among healthy individuals as well as patients who have low back pain.…”