2017
DOI: 10.4072/rbp.2017.2.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated archosauriform teeth from the Upper Triassic Candelária Sequence (Hyperodapedon Assemblage Zone, Southern Brazil)

Abstract: -We describe isolated teeth found in the locality "Sítio Piveta" (Hyperodapedon Assemblage Zone, Candelaria Sequence, Upper Triassic of the Paraná Basin). The material consists of five specimens, here classified into three different morphotypes. The morphotype I is characterized by pronounced elongation, rounded base and symmetry between lingual and labial surfaces. The morphotype II presents serrated mesial and distal edges, mesial denticles decreasing in size toward the base, distal denticles present until t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our relatively simple metrics can be used to describe subtle differences in tooth morphology. These objective methods for grouping teeth provide a complimentary method for assigning teeth to dietary roles, a practice that typically relies on qualitative comparisons to the teeth of extant taxa of known diet (Fraser & Walkden, 1983; Sander, 1999; Barrett, 2000; Hungerbühler, 2000) or other fossil taxa (Dzik, 2003; Hendrickx, Mateus & Araújo, 2015; De Oliveira & Pinheiro, 2017). Furthermore, the methods applied herein provide an evaluation of ecological disparity that is separate from the features used in phylogenetic analyses, so that we can compare these two evolutionary phenomena independently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our relatively simple metrics can be used to describe subtle differences in tooth morphology. These objective methods for grouping teeth provide a complimentary method for assigning teeth to dietary roles, a practice that typically relies on qualitative comparisons to the teeth of extant taxa of known diet (Fraser & Walkden, 1983; Sander, 1999; Barrett, 2000; Hungerbühler, 2000) or other fossil taxa (Dzik, 2003; Hendrickx, Mateus & Araújo, 2015; De Oliveira & Pinheiro, 2017). Furthermore, the methods applied herein provide an evaluation of ecological disparity that is separate from the features used in phylogenetic analyses, so that we can compare these two evolutionary phenomena independently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in situ teeth of Nundasuchus can exhibit either state depending on the proximity of the mesial edge of the crown to the distal edge of the preceding tooth. Although this combination of traits is only found in Nundasuchus in the Manda Beds fauna, archosauriforms from the Middle and Late Triassic elsewhere possess the same traits (De Oliveira & Pinheiro, 2017; Schoch et al, 2018).…”
Section: Isolated Tooth Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Fraser & Walkden, 1983;Sander, 1999;Barrett, 2000;Hungerbühler, 2000) or other fossil taxa (e.g. Dzik, 2003;Hendrickx, Mateus & Araújo, 2015;de Oliveira & Pinheiro, 2017). Furthermore, the methods applied herein provide an evaluation of ecological disparity that is separate from the features used in phylogenetic analyses, so that we can compare these two evolutionary phenomena independently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pivetta site yields conchostracans, actinopterygians, lungifsh (Richter & Toledo, 2008), temnospondyls (Dias da Silva et al, 2012), rhynchosaurs (Langer et al, 2007), a silesaurid (Müller & Garcia, 2023), and indeterminate archosauriforms (De Oliveira & Pinheiro, 2017), most of which are still unpublished. It is noteworthy that this particular outcrop has provided an extensive amount of isolated archosauriform teeth; few of which have been described, including phytosaur and “rauisuchian”‐like morphotypes (De Oliveira & Pinheiro, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%