It is not OK but it works – unproductive entrepreneurship, the case of Poland

Abstract

The concept of unproductive entrepreneurs was introduced to science by Baumol, who pointed out the differences in business output between countries. Unproductive behaviour of entrepreneurs is often a consequence of ineffective institutions used by entrepreneurs for rent seeking. The aim of this article is to examine subjective norms (S.N.) and attitudes regarding specified types of unproductive entrepreneurship, which in many cases takes the form of unethical or even unlawful behaviour among entrepreneurs in Poland. Examples of such behaviour are: bribery and tax evasion, burdensome lawsuits, often unfounded or lobbying. The structure of the research was based on Baumol's work while the research model was based on Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour (T.P.B.). In this article we argue that unproductive entrepreneurship in transforming economies is often forced by inefficient institutions and the desire to avoid bankruptcy. The results of the survey carried out among 270 Polish entrepreneurs indicated a permissive and subjective standard regarding tax evasion when the existence of their business is endangered, and more negative behavioural beliefs (B.B.) regarding the effectiveness of tax evasion than regarding the effectiveness of paying bribes (P.B.).

The economic effects of politically connected entrepreneurs on the quality and rate of regional entrepreneurship

“…We add here the following: ignoring today the presence and the significant role of politically connected entrepreneurs (PE) in the regional economies would be a major and costly omission. Entrepreneurial behavior has an economic impact, but "not everything labeled as 'entrepreneurial' is desirable" (Sauka & Welter, 2007: 88); entrepreneurship is not always positive and developmental "by nature" (Baumol, 1990;Desai & Acs, 2007;Desai et al, 2013;Wasilczuk & Stankiewicz, 2017).…”