Item Development and Performance of Tobacco Product and Regulation Perception Items for the Health Information National Trends Survey

Peterson, Emily; Portnoy, David B.; Blake, Kelly D.; Willis, Gordon; Trundle, Katy; Caporaso, Andrew; Maitland, Aaron; Kaufman, Annette

doi:10.1093/ntr/nty193

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To assess participants’ awareness of FDA’s authority to regulate tobacco products, we adapted a measure from the 2015 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) ( Peterson et al, 2019 , National Institutes of Health, 2015 ) that asked participants, “Who do you believe regulates tobacco products in the U.S.?” Participants selected all who they thought applied from a list of six entities (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Federal Trade Commission, FDA, National Institutes of Health, Surgeon General, and tobacco industry/companies) or selected “None of the above.” We also asked participants, “Has the government put rules in place designed to make tobacco products less harmful?” ( Fix et al, 2011 ) Participants could select “yes,” “no,” or “I don’t know”.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Believability of messaging concerning a hypothetical product standard to lower a constituent in cigarettes or smokeless tobacco among U.S. Adults who use tobacco

Venrick,

Margolis,

Bernat

et al. 2024

Preventive Medicine Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Believability of messaging concerning a hypothetical product standard to lower a constituent in cigarettes or smokeless tobacco among U.S. Adults who use tobacco

Venrick,

Margolis,

Bernat

et al. 2024

Preventive Medicine Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The overall weighted response rate for HINTS 5, Cycle 2 (2018) was 32.85% (N=3504). Additional details about the HINTS data collection programme have been published elsewhere14–17 and specific details about the 2018 administration are available in the methodology report for HINTS 5, Cycle 2 (2018) 18…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Population prevalence and predictors of self-reported exposure to court-ordered, tobacco-related corrective statements

2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo describe the population prevalence and predictors of self-reported exposure to court-ordered tobacco-related corrective statements in 2017–2018, when they were first implemented in newspapers and on television.MethodsNationally representative data from the 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey were used (n=3504). Frequencies and weighted proportions were calculated for seeing any corrective statement and for each of the five court-ordered corrective statements. Weighted, multivariable logistic regression was used to examine sociodemographic and smoking status predictors of reported exposure to any corrective statement.ResultsIn 2018, an estimated 40.6% of US adults had seen messages in newspapers or on television in the past 6 months stating that a federal court has ordered tobacco companies to make statements about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. Reported exposure to topic-specific statements ranged from 11.4% (manipulation of cigarette design) to 34.7% (health effects). Those with a high school education were significantly less likely than those with a college degree to report seeing the statements (OR=0.69, CI 0.50 to 0.95) and current smokers were significantly more likely than never smokers to report seeing them (OR=1.68, CI 1.12 to 2.53).ConclusionsIn the first 6 months of corrective statement implementation, an estimated 40.6% of US adults reported at least one exposure to any corrective statement, and current smokers were more likely than never smokers to report exposure. Traditional media channels can be effective for tobacco-related message dissemination; however, they may fail to reach more than half of the adult population without additional targeted communication efforts.

show abstract

Outcome Expectancies, Health Information Seeking, and Cancer Beliefs Associated with Multivitamin/Mineral Use in a National Sample, HINTS-FDA 2015

Knippen¹,

Mahas²,

Wasshenova³

2020

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Item Development and Performance of Tobacco Product and Regulation Perception Items for the Health Information National Trends Survey

Abstract: A "don't know" response option is helpful for items assessing many emerging tobacco products, but presents several analytic challenges that should be carefully considered. Multiple items assessing specific tobacco product and regulation perception items are warranted in future surveys.

Cited by 5 publications

References 20 publications

Believability of messaging concerning a hypothetical product standard to lower a constituent in cigarettes or smokeless tobacco among U.S. Adults who use tobacco

Believability of messaging concerning a hypothetical product standard to lower a constituent in cigarettes or smokeless tobacco among U.S. Adults who use tobacco

Population prevalence and predictors of self-reported exposure to court-ordered, tobacco-related corrective statements

Outcome Expectancies, Health Information Seeking, and Cancer Beliefs Associated with Multivitamin/Mineral Use in a National Sample, HINTS-FDA 2015

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About