2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3802499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Patients with SARS-CoV-2: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16 Since August 2020, inpatient and outpatient treatments of COVID-19 with IVM have been applied across 25 countries, 10 with more than 20 RCTs conducted for IVM treatment regimens. 10,17,18 Seven of nine meta-analyses of these RCTs for IVM treatment reporting in 2021, all conducted using Cochrane analysis methodology, found signi cant [18][19][20][21][22] or possible 23,24 indications of IVM e cacy, with a mean 0.33 relative risk (RR) of mortality vs controls. Most of these 20 RCTs for IVM treatment of COVID-19 showed statistically signi cant mortality reductions or other clinical bene ts.…”
Section: Ivm For Covid-19 Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 Since August 2020, inpatient and outpatient treatments of COVID-19 with IVM have been applied across 25 countries, 10 with more than 20 RCTs conducted for IVM treatment regimens. 10,17,18 Seven of nine meta-analyses of these RCTs for IVM treatment reporting in 2021, all conducted using Cochrane analysis methodology, found signi cant [18][19][20][21][22] or possible 23,24 indications of IVM e cacy, with a mean 0.33 relative risk (RR) of mortality vs controls. Most of these 20 RCTs for IVM treatment of COVID-19 showed statistically signi cant mortality reductions or other clinical bene ts.…”
Section: Ivm For Covid-19 Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 with more than 20 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted for such IVM treatments. 3,43,44 Seven of eight meta-analyses of these IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021, all done using Cochrane analysis methodology, found significant [44][45][46][47][48] or possible 49,50 indications of IVM efficacy, with a mean 0.33 relative risk (RR) of mortality vs. controls. The eighth meta-analyses reported no efficacy for IVM, specifying a value of RR=1.1 for mortality, 51 but corrected that to RR=0.37 (a 63% mortality reduction) in a revised version after fixing switched treatment and control values for one key RCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%