2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01244-0_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jason: A Scalable Reputation System for the Semantic Web

Abstract: Abstract. The recent development of the Internet, especially the expanding use of social software and dynamic content generation commonly termed as Web 2.0 enables users to find information about almost every possible topic on the Web. On the downside, it becomes more and more difficult to decide which information can be trusted in. In this paper we propose the enhancement of Web 2.0 by a scalable and secure cross-platform reputation system that takes into account a user's social network. Our proposed solution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pada tahapan penelitian gambar 1 diawali dengan tahap 1 yaitu survey sistem akademik berbasis web yang akan dijadikan sebagai objek dari analisis penelitian, kemudian membuat pengembangan model yang akan diusulkan, dilanjutkan dengan pengambilan sampel untuk penilaian dari model yang diusulkan. [10] Selanjutnya pengumpulan data dilakukan dan dilakukan analisis pada model yang diusulkan untuk mengetahui apakah data ini valid dan reabilitas terhadap model.…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified
“…Pada tahapan penelitian gambar 1 diawali dengan tahap 1 yaitu survey sistem akademik berbasis web yang akan dijadikan sebagai objek dari analisis penelitian, kemudian membuat pengembangan model yang akan diusulkan, dilanjutkan dengan pengambilan sampel untuk penilaian dari model yang diusulkan. [10] Selanjutnya pengumpulan data dilakukan dan dilakukan analisis pada model yang diusulkan untuk mengetahui apakah data ini valid dan reabilitas terhadap model.…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified
“…Here is the need for solutions that can be easily integrated in the existing web technologies. The suggestion we implemented in [19] was to use the Resource Description Framework (RDF) [13] common for the Web 2.0 and allowing to add reputation information as meta-information to arbitrary web content. -Algorithm: In every reputation system different implementations of rating function, evaluation function and reputation function are defined depending on the system designer.…”
Section: Interoperability Of Reputation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A central problem for privacy-respecting reputation systems is that they must guarantee that users cannot abolish negative reputation. This can either be reached by only allowing positive reputation, as proposed by Voss and Androulaki et al [5,6], by making it difficult for the user to distinguish between positive and negative ratings, as proposed in [7] by Steinbrecher, or by a trusted third party. Thereby, this trusted third party can either be an external reputation provider, as proposed by Pingel et al and Anwar et al [8,9] or a trusted platform module for the user, as proposed in [10,5] by Kinateder et al and Voss. Anonymity of the users involved is not as easy as just using anonymizing services on the network layer.…”
Section: Related Work On Privacy-respecting Reputation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the number of reputation values is fixed and small. Even if we do not specify a concrete reputation function here, this requirement must be met in order to restrict identifiability of users by their reputation values, see requirement (7). All users will finally have the best reputation value and will keep it, thus the system reaches a final state and becomes useless, i.e., no user has an incentive to behave fairly, which violates fairness (5) and liveliness of reputation (4).…”
Section: Privacy and Security Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%