1981
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(81)90087-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint two-dimensional observations of ground magnetic and ionospheric electric fields associated with auroral zone currents: Current systems associated with local auroral break-ups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
118
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
11
118
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They proposed that the ground magnetic signature observed is related to an auroral breakup. Our resulting current system in fact shows some similarities to the geometry of the breakup current system as shown in Baumjohann et al (1981), in that a locally enhanced westward electrojet is diverged by concentrated upward¯owing FACs. On the other hand, there are also important di erences between their current system and ours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They proposed that the ground magnetic signature observed is related to an auroral breakup. Our resulting current system in fact shows some similarities to the geometry of the breakup current system as shown in Baumjohann et al (1981), in that a locally enhanced westward electrojet is diverged by concentrated upward¯owing FACs. On the other hand, there are also important di erences between their current system and ours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…On the other hand, there are also important di erences between their current system and ours. Whereas in the breakup model of Baumjohann et al (1981), the enhanced westward jet is fed by distant and more distributed downward-¯owing FACs, in our case this feeding occurs locally at the northeastern edge of the auroral form (compare Fig. 8b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously mentioned, we believe the wedge current system discussed in this paper is an oversimplification of the real current systems [Baumjohann et al, 1981]. There are several situations that could account for discrepancies between observations and model.…”
Section: Ti-ioe D^t^ Soetmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These ionospheric electric ®eld and conductivity changes combine to produce the characteristic ground magnetic perturbations during the substorm expansion phase. VHF coherent scatter radars were ®rst used to study the spatial structure of the substorm electric ®elds (Baumjohann et al, 1981;Inhester et al, 1981;Opgenoorth et al, 1983) and suggested a region of low-electric ®eld within the dynamic structure of the substorm electrojets. Incoherent scatter radars also o er an excellent technique for the study of both the ionospheric¯ow velocities and ionospheric particle precipitation during the substorm expansion phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%