Communicating Biological Sciences 2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315572888-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Journalism and Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Marjorie Kruvand, bioethicists are generally presented as “interchangeable experts with a unified perspective” (Kruvand, 2012). Journalists prefer external reviewers because of their neutral role in science news, which differs from other fields of journalism such as sport, economy, or art criticism, in which journalists are often highly opinionated (Murcott, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Marjorie Kruvand, bioethicists are generally presented as “interchangeable experts with a unified perspective” (Kruvand, 2012). Journalists prefer external reviewers because of their neutral role in science news, which differs from other fields of journalism such as sport, economy, or art criticism, in which journalists are often highly opinionated (Murcott, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the ethics of science communication attracting increasing attention (Murcott 2006 ), such an effort is sorely needed for neuroscience as well as for other sciences. In principle, the framework outline here could also be used for the improvement of science reporting on other scientific and technological domains: both for those already existing as for those newly emerging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%