Judicial Control in the European Union

Hinarejos, Alicia

doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199569960.001.0001

Cited by 18 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…exclusion has been part of the DNA of the Union's foreign and security policy, CFSP matters were not conceived of as hermetically sealed from all other areas of EU law» (Koutrakos, 2018: 6). Por esta razón, la doctrina ha prestado mucha atención a la exclusión del control judicial de la PESC en los últimos años (Hinarejos, 2009;Griller 2013;de Baere and Koutrakos, 2012;Wessel, 2016;Andrés Sáenz de Santamaría, 2017;Hillion, 2016;Wessel, 2018;Santos Vara, 2021). Hillion ha demostrado que el argumento de que el TJUE no dispone de competencia en la PESC no es defendible tras la entrada en vigor del Tratado de Lisboa (Hillion, 2014: 47).…”

Section: La Exclusión Del Control Judicial De La Pesc En Los Tratadosunclassified

El control judicial de la política exterior: Hacia la normalización de la PESC en el ordenamiento jurídico de la Unión Europea (a propósito del asunto Bank Refah Kargaran)

Vara¹

2021

Rev. Derecho Comunitario Eur.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La sentencia del TJUE en el asunto Bank Refah Kargaran va a contribuir significativamente a reforzar la protección jurídica de los particulares en relación con las medidas restrictivas adoptadas por la UE. Por primera vez, el TJUE se ha declarado competente para conocer de los recursos que tienen por objeto obtener una indemnización por los perjuicios sufridos como consecuencia de la adopción de medidas restrictivas en el ámbito de la PESC. La sentencia Bank Refah Kargaran tiene profundas implicaciones constitucionales para el ordenamiento jurídico de la UE, ya que viene a confirmar que el rol del TJUE en la PESC no es tan limitado como aparentan los Tratados. Los actos jurídicos de la PESC no pueden ser considerados como instrumentos de naturaleza netamente intergubernamental que se mantienen al margen del control judicial. Los actos de la PESC han de ser interpretados en el marco de la estructura general de los Tratados, incluyendo el sistema general de recursos de la UE.

show abstract

Section: La Exclusión Del Control Judicial De La Pesc En Los Tratadosunclassified

El control judicial de la política exterior: Hacia la normalización de la PESC en el ordenamiento jurídico de la Unión Europea (a propósito del asunto Bank Refah Kargaran)

Vara¹

2021

Rev. Derecho Comunitario Eur.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…113 Further, since the entering into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the Court of Justice might move more into the direction of a true constitutional court. 114 It is likely that the Court will more frequently be called to protect individuals from the European institutions or national measures implementing European law. This is due to the extension of its jurisdiction over maters of police and judicial cooperation (former third pillar), and over individual sanctions (275 TFEU).…”

Section: Heating Up?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Protecting Supremacy from External Influences: A Precondition for a European Constitutional Legal Order?

Eckes

2012

European Law Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of international law obligations that have binding force on the Union and/or its Member States is sharply increasing. This paper argues that in this light the well‐functioning of the European Union ultimately depends on the protection of the principle of supremacy from law originating outside of the EU legal order. The supremacy of EU law is essential to ensuring that Member States cannot use national rules to justify derogation from EU law. As a matter of principle, international treaties concluded by the Member States rank at the level of ordinary national law within the European legal order and below all forms of European law (both primary and secondary). Article 351 TFEU exceptionally allows Member States to derogate from primary EU law in order to comply with obligations under anterior international agreements. It does not however allow a departure from the principle of supremacy that underlies the European legal order. In Kadi I, the Court of Justice of the European Union stated that Article 351 TFEU, while it permits derogation from primary law, may under no circumstances permit circumvention of the “very foundations” of the EU legal order. This introduces an additional condition that all acts within the sphere of EU law need to comply with a form of “super‐supreme law”. It also strengthened the principle of supremacy and gave the Court of Justice the role of the guardian of the Union's “foundations”. The Court of Justice acted on the necessity of defending the Union as a distinct legal order, retaining the autonomous interpretation of its own law, and ultimately ensuring that the Union can act as an independent actor on the international plane.

show abstract

“…The Treaty of Lisbon has now recast this whole framework by incorporating the AFSJ acquis into the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). One of the most significant changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty was the extension of the Court's jurisdiction to cover also the former third-pillar area (Lenaerts 2010;Lenaerts and Gutiérrez-Fons 2016;Hinarejos 2009). Thus, the Lisbon Treaty stipulates in Article 267 TFEU that (summarized):…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The European Court of Justice as a Game Changer: Fiduciary Obligations in the Area of 'Freedom, Security and Justice'

Herlin–Karnell

2016

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Judicial Control in the European Union

Cited by 18 publications

References 0 publications

El control judicial de la política exterior: Hacia la normalización de la PESC en el ordenamiento jurídico de la Unión Europea (a propósito del asunto Bank Refah Kargaran)

El control judicial de la política exterior: Hacia la normalización de la PESC en el ordenamiento jurídico de la Unión Europea (a propósito del asunto Bank Refah Kargaran)

Protecting Supremacy from External Influences: A Precondition for a European Constitutional Legal Order?

The European Court of Justice as a Game Changer: Fiduciary Obligations in the Area of 'Freedom, Security and Justice'

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About