2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jujube stones based highly efficient activated carbon for methylene blue adsorption: Kinetics and isotherms modeling, thermodynamics and mechanism study, optimization via response surface methodology and machine learning approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess the performance of the ANN, the mean square error (MSE) was calculated to demonstrate the statistical difference between the predicted and experimental values [ 12 , 15 ]. The accuracy of the developed model was assessed by the value of the correlation coefficient R 2 [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the performance of the ANN, the mean square error (MSE) was calculated to demonstrate the statistical difference between the predicted and experimental values [ 12 , 15 ]. The accuracy of the developed model was assessed by the value of the correlation coefficient R 2 [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models were calculated according to Eqs. ( 8 – 11 ), respectively 32 , 33 . where, q e (mg/g) and q t (mg/g) are the adsorption capacity at equilibrium and at time t (min), respectively, K 1 (1/min) is the rate constants of pseudo-first-order; K 2 (g/(mg·min)) is the rate constant of pseudo-second-order; k i [mg/(g min 0.5 )] is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant; A and B are the double constant equation model constants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the developed models was examined using statistical analysis and ANOVA at a 95% confidence level. Various model quality measures, such as the p-value, F-value, degree of freedom (DF), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), adjusted determination of coefficient (R adj 2 ), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), were used to evaluate the statistical adequacy of the models [15,25,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. The F-value describes the variation in the responses, which can be evaluated using a regression equation, whereas the p-value indicates the statistical adequacy of the developed model.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response variable is Y, and the model parameters are β 0 to β 10 . Afterward, the model parameters with a high explanatory power (PR < 5%) were kept and are shown in bold and underlined in Table 2 [15]. Conversely, the other parameters with PR > 5% were removed, and the resulting models are represented by the equations in Table 3.…”
Section: Full Factorial Design Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation