Jumping Spiders (Class Arachnida, Order Araneae, Family Salticidae)

Richman, David B.

doi:10.1007/0-306-48380-7_2256

Cited by 10 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“… Bredana complicata Bonnet 1955 : 915; Gertsch 1936 : 21, mf, desc. (figs 33–35); Hill and Edwards 2013 : 21; Jackman 1997 : 167; Richman and Cutler 1978 : 84; Richman et al 2005 : 210; Richman et al 2011b : 5; Richman et al 2012a : 5; Richman et al 2012b : 5; Roewer 1955 : 1255; Vogel 1970b : 17 …”

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Phidippus purpuratus Keyserling, 1885; Chickering 1944 : 199; Kaston 1953 : 112; Peckham and Peckham 1909 : 423; Richman and Cutler 1978 : 97; Vogel 1970b : 19 [not in Texas]…”

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Admestina tibialis Breene et al 1993c : 22, 48, 65, mf (figs 42A-D); Chickering 1944 : 143; Comstock 1912 : 679, desc. ; Comstock 1940 : 687; Dean et al 1982 : 255; Hunter 1988 : 18–20; Jackman 1997 : 167; Peckham and Peckham 1909 : 510; Petrunkevitch 1911 : 589; Richman and Cutler 1978 : 83; Richman et al 2011b : 3; Richman et al 2012a : 3; Richman et al 2012b : 3; Roth 1982 : 40–3; Roth 1985 : B-36–2; Vogel 1970b : 17; Young and Edwards 1990 : 21 [ Piel 1992 : 272, mf, desc. (figs 3–4, 11)] …”

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Corythalia canosa (Walckenaer, 1837); Jackman 1997 : 128, desc., 167 (photo 41a); Richman and Cutler 1978 : 84 [S] …”

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(figs 1–2, 15–16, 42, 50); Jackman 1997 : 167; Maddison 1996 : 332, m (fig. 42); Petrunkevitch 1911 : 607; Richman and Cutler 1978 : 83 [spelling]; Richman et al 2005 : 208; Richman et al 2011b : 5; Richman et al 2012a : 5; Richman et al 2012b : 5; Roewer 1955 : 1036…”

Section: Taxonomyunclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

Catalogue of Texas spiders

Dean¹

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This catalogue lists 1,084 species of spiders (three identified to genus only) in 311 genera from 53 families currently recorded from Texas and is based on the “Bibliography of Texas Spiders” published by Bea Vogel in 1970. The online list of species can be found at http://pecanspiders.tamu.edu/spidersoftexas.htm. Many taxonomic revisions have since been published, particularly in the families Araneidae, Gnaphosidae and Leptonetidae. Many genera in other families have been revised. The Anyphaenidae, Ctenidae, Hahniidae, Nesticidae, Sicariidae and Tetragnathidae were also revised. Several families have been added and others split up. Several genera of Corinnidae were transferred to Phrurolithidae and Trachelidae. Two genera from Miturgidae were transferred to Eutichuridae. Zoridae was synonymized under Miturgidae. A single species formerly in Amaurobiidae is now in the Family Amphinectidae. Some trapdoor spiders in the family Ctenizidae have been transferred to Euctenizidae.Gertsch and Mulaik started a list of Texas spiders in 1940. In a letter from Willis J. Gertsch dated October 20, 1982, he stated “Years ago a first listing of the Texas fauna was published by me based largely on Stanley Mulaik material, but it had to be abandoned because of other tasks.” This paper is a compendium of the spiders of Texas with distribution, habitat, collecting method and other data available from revisions and collections. This includes many records and unpublished data (including data from three unpublished studies). One of these studies included 16,000 adult spiders belonging to 177 species in 29 families. All specimens in that study were measured and results are in the appendix. Hidalgo County has 340 species recorded with Brazos County at 323 and Travis County at 314 species. These reflect the amount of collecting in the area.

show abstract

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Phidippus purpuratus Keyserling, 1885; Chickering 1944 : 199; Kaston 1953 : 112; Peckham and Peckham 1909 : 423; Richman and Cutler 1978 : 97; Vogel 1970b : 19 [not in Texas]…”

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Corythalia canosa (Walckenaer, 1837); Jackman 1997 : 128, desc., 167 (photo 41a); Richman and Cutler 1978 : 84 [S] …”

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Taxonomyunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Catalogue of Texas spiders

Dean¹

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Strands of Connection: Livestock Grazing, Vegetation Density, and Orb-Weaver Spider Persistence

Oyarzabal,

Guimarães

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies on the effects of grazing disturbances in grasslands have shown mixed results for spider diversity, mainly regarding their guilds. While ungrazing, low, and moderate grazing potentially enhance diversity of orb-weavers, heavy grazing seems to reduce specieś richness. On the population level, studies of orb-weavers are scarce, and the effects of grazing are unknow. In this way, we investigated the effects of different levels of grazing on population persistence of orb-weaver spiders, hypothesizing that low to intermediate disturbances benefit populations. We predict that high grazing, due to the removal of vegetation structure, will negatively affect occupancy and abundance of orb-weavers. For that, we experimentally controlled grazing pressure and obtained population occurrence and counts of two orb-weaver spider species,Argiope argentataandAlpaida quadrilorata. We found thatA. argentatawas directly affected by grazing, as it relies on higher vegetation for web-building. In contrast,A. quadrilorata, which occurs in cattle-resistant rosette plants, showed no effects of grazing.Implications for insect conservation:Our study emphasizes the need for balanced grazing practices and habitat conservation to protect orb-weaver spiders and other arthropods, as well as, species-specific effects for species from the same guild, underscoring their ecological significance in maintaining ecosystem stability.

show abstract

Advances in the reconstruction of the spider tree of life: A roadmap for spider systematics and comparative studies

Kulkarni,

Wood,

Hormiga

2023

Cladistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last decade and a half, advances in genetic sequencing technologies have revolutionized systematics, transforming the field from studying morphological characters or a few genetic markers, to genomic datasets in the phylogenomic era. A plethora of molecular phylogenetic studies on many taxonomic groups have come about, converging on, or refuting prevailing morphology or legacy‐marker‐based hypotheses about evolutionary affinities. Spider systematics has been no exception to this transformation and the inter‐relationships of several groups have now been studied using genomic data. About 51 500 extant spider species have been described, all with a conservative body plan, but innumerable morphological and behavioural peculiarities. Inferring the spider tree of life using morphological data has been a challenging task. Molecular data have corroborated many hypotheses of higher‐level relationships, but also resulted in new groups that refute previous hypotheses. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the reconstruction of the spider tree of life and highlight areas where additional effort is needed with potential solutions. We base this review on the most comprehensive spider phylogeny to date, representing 131 of the 132 spider families. To achieve this sampling, we combined six Sanger‐based markers with newly generated and publicly available genome‐scale datasets. We find that some inferred relationships between major lineages of spiders (such as Austrochiloidea, Palpimanoidea and Synspermiata) are robust across different classes of data. However, several new hypotheses have emerged with different classes of molecular data. We identify and discuss the robust and controversial hypotheses and compile this blueprint to design future studies targeting systematic revisions of these problematic groups. We offer an evolutionary framework to explore comparative questions such as evolution of venoms, silk, webs, morphological traits and reproductive strategies.

show abstract

Jumping Spiders (Class Arachnida, Order Araneae, Family Salticidae)

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

Catalogue of Texas spiders

Catalogue of Texas spiders

Strands of Connection: Livestock Grazing, Vegetation Density, and Orb-Weaver Spider Persistence

Advances in the reconstruction of the spider tree of life: A roadmap for spider systematics and comparative studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About