2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40900-016-0044-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Keeping it credible in cohort multiple Randomised Controlled Trials: the Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE 75+) study model of patient and public involvement and engagement

Abstract: Plain English summaryThere are well documented benefits to involving patients and the public in research. However, there is little research published about their involvement in large complex studies such as cohort multiple Randomised Controlled Trials (cmRCTs). The cmRCT method establishes a group of participants, with a common characteristic (e.g. older people) who will be followed over a number of years. Other (sub) studies can also recruit from this pool of people. This method offers researchers many advant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of nine articles, all conducted in the UK, were included in the review. Eight of them focused on people with dementia [ 21 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], and one on people with frailty [ 28 ]. None of the articles explicitly presented methods for the involvement of people in nursing homes, or with mobility, hearing or visual impairments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of nine articles, all conducted in the UK, were included in the review. Eight of them focused on people with dementia [ 21 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], and one on people with frailty [ 28 ]. None of the articles explicitly presented methods for the involvement of people in nursing homes, or with mobility, hearing or visual impairments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPI was done to enhance the connection to the target population [ 28 ], the appropriateness of documents [ 25 ], the recruitment [ 21 ], the interview experiences and data [ 31 ] as well as the validity of results [ 30 ]. Some methods aimed for improvements beyond the level of single studies: they wanted to enhance the acceptability and feasibility of future research [ 27 ] or to improve the use of resources [ 29 ] by involving patients or the public.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 56 frameworks were written up in 55 academic papers. 5,10,12,31,[33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][47][48][49][50]52,53,[55][56][57][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][87][88][89][90]…”
Section: Description Of Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74 One considered the economic costs and benefits of lay involvement in different phases of a clinical trial 71 ; and one addressed how to maintain recruitment to successive trials over time. 49 A framework for improving patient engagement in Alzheimer's disease trials highlighted specific challenges with this target population and offered solutions based on a literature review. 87 Most studies in this category were funded by bodies that sponsor clinical trials and/or seek to ensure patient input to such trials.…”
Section: Priority-setting Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 CE principles need to be approached and monitored with a strong degree of public oversight to be effective. 26 In a southern African context, transparent and practical CE approaches can be enhanced by taking into account the concept of Ubuntu. 27,28 This is particularly important in genetics and genomics research where families and communities are central to the science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%