Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison

Huntington, Hillard G.; Bhargava, Abha; Daniels, D.; Weyant, John P.; Avraam, Charalampos; Bistline, John; Edmonds, James A.; Giarola, Sara; Hansen, Matthew C.; Johnston, Peter; Molar-Cruz, Anahi; Nadew, Michael; Siddiqui, Sauleh; Vaillancourt, Kathleen; Victor, Nadejda

doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111599

Cited by 26 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous work has reported on multimodel comparison studies through efforts such as those of the Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (Huntington et al 2020) and integrated assessment model comparisons (Prina et al 2022). This report compares two very different classes of models, and it includes several models that have not previously been compared.…”

Section: Rationale For Comparison Of Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Renewable Energy and Efficiency Technologies in Scenarios of U.S. Decarbonization in Two Types of Models: Comparison of GCAM Modeling and Sector-Specific Modeling

Binsted

Suchyta

Zhang

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Rationale For Comparison Of Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Renewable Energy and Efficiency Technologies in Scenarios of U.S. Decarbonization in Two Types of Models: Comparison of GCAM Modeling and Sector-Specific Modeling

Binsted

Suchyta

Zhang

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The research on the integrated energy service market in developed countries is much earlier, mainly the theoretical research on the combination of market and new energy services. As a major energy producer and consumer, the United States is committed to establishing an independent energy system with the most diversified power supply system in the world (Huntington et al, 2020;Tsai et al, 2020). Although policies vary in different states, they basically stipulate that the real-time power market should promote the optimal operation of the new energy market.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on low-carbon service mode of park-level integrated energy system with flexible supply and demand balance

Pan,

Li,

Liu

et al. 2024

Front. Energy Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Against the backdrop of “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” goals in China, the park-level integrated energy system is a significant approach to meeting the energy consumption demand of users and improving the utilization rate of new energy. To take into account both the interests of integrated energy services (IES) providers and the current power market rules in China, targeting at low-carbon energy consumption, a balancing service mode for integrated energy services providers is created herein based on the idea of balancing multiple interests of regional integrated energy services providers. It aims to break down the market barriers and address the tricky problem that the integrated energy services industry fails to establish a sophisticated industrial system under the original mode. Combining the integrated energy services with the auxiliary market of power balance, the paper analyzes the characteristics of energy flow within the system, and puts forward the optimization scheme of regional integrated energy balancing services under the low-carbon background. The objective is solved by Mayfly algorithm and compared for analysis, and the results show that the optimal daily operating cost is 2632.59 yuan and the daily carbon emission is 3869.90 kg under the typical industrial scenario. The examples provided here show that the optimization plan for integrated energy balancing services can reduce carbon emissions from the park-level integrated energy system and boost the revenue for integrated energy service providers. It provides theoretical support for the green transformation of energy enterprises and promotes the healthy development of the global integrated energy industry.

show abstract

A method to analyze the costs and emissions tradeoffs of connecting ERCOT to WECC

Kassel,

Rhodes,

Webber

2025

Applied Energy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison

Cited by 26 publications

References 24 publications

Renewable Energy and Efficiency Technologies in Scenarios of U.S. Decarbonization in Two Types of Models: Comparison of GCAM Modeling and Sector-Specific Modeling

Renewable Energy and Efficiency Technologies in Scenarios of U.S. Decarbonization in Two Types of Models: Comparison of GCAM Modeling and Sector-Specific Modeling

Study on low-carbon service mode of park-level integrated energy system with flexible supply and demand balance

A method to analyze the costs and emissions tradeoffs of connecting ERCOT to WECC

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About