2023
DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10070436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ki67 Index in Patnaik Grade 2/Kiupel Low-Grade Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors with Early Lymph Node Metastasis: A Descriptive Study

Abstract: Several studies evaluating Ki67 in canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (cMCTs) have reported its prognostic value when tumors of all histological grades are included. This study aims to evaluate whether the Ki67 index has a predictive value in a homogeneous cohort of G2/LG cMCTs with HN2 lymph nodes (LNs) and to describe the clinical outcome. The second goal was to explore the correlation between the Ki67 index and MC. The medical databases of three institutions were retrospectively searched for dogs undergoing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Histological characteristics-such as distinct patterns and the mitotic index (MI: the ratio between the number of cells undergoing mitosis and the total number of cells in a population), together with the assessment of proliferation markers, such as Ki-67 (a nuclear protein highly expressed in cycling cells)-are essential for evaluating the aggressiveness of all types of MCTs, including subcutaneous MCTs. This is because histological grading criteria are not applicable for categorizing subcutaneous MCTs [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological characteristics-such as distinct patterns and the mitotic index (MI: the ratio between the number of cells undergoing mitosis and the total number of cells in a population), together with the assessment of proliferation markers, such as Ki-67 (a nuclear protein highly expressed in cycling cells)-are essential for evaluating the aggressiveness of all types of MCTs, including subcutaneous MCTs. This is because histological grading criteria are not applicable for categorizing subcutaneous MCTs [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%