1991
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199101000-00032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kidney Allograft Tolerance in Primates Without Chronic Immunosuppression-the Role of Veto Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCR-flow assay, combining the sensitivity of DNA amplification techniques with the detection of CD epitopes using monoclonal antibody flow cytometry analysis has now allowed for the detection of several specific cell lineages of donor origin in the recipient. It has the potential of eventually identifying the presence of such "facilitating cells" (35,36) and equating this with immunological unresponsiveness. The in vitro assays described in this report, however, have demonstrated nonspecific rather than donor specific immune inhibitory effects of the donor marrow, i.e., possibly because of nonspecific effects of "suppressor cell" subsets (33,37,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCR-flow assay, combining the sensitivity of DNA amplification techniques with the detection of CD epitopes using monoclonal antibody flow cytometry analysis has now allowed for the detection of several specific cell lineages of donor origin in the recipient. It has the potential of eventually identifying the presence of such "facilitating cells" (35,36) and equating this with immunological unresponsiveness. The in vitro assays described in this report, however, have demonstrated nonspecific rather than donor specific immune inhibitory effects of the donor marrow, i.e., possibly because of nonspecific effects of "suppressor cell" subsets (33,37,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These subpopulations include "natural" suppressors 64 ; CD8 nonalloreactive T cells 65 ; CD8 ϩ , CD3 ϩ , CD45 R ϩ , Thy-1 ϩ , and TCR Ϫ "facilitator" cells 56 ; and CD2 ϩ , CD8 ϩ , CD16 ϩ , DR Ϫ , CD3 Ϫ , and CD38 Ϫ cells. 66 Thus, part of the effectiveness of our approach, using antigenspecific preexposure combined with anti-CD40 ligand blockade, high levels of marrow cells, and nonablative (100 cGy) host treatment, may be the infusion of appropriate numbers of tolerizing stem cells or tolerizing cells without stem cell potential. In addition, Ferrara 67 has described the phenomenon of "cytokine storm" occurring with cytoablative therapy and potentially inducing GVHD.…”
Section: Minimal Myeloablation and Murine Allochimerismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Veto cells suppress CTL precursor function against Ags present on the veto cell surface, but not against those on third-party allogeneic cells (28,29). Veto cells have been shown to prevent the rejection of allogeneic BM grafts in an Ag-specific manner (30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%