2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b01790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of Anionic Living Copolymerization of Isoprene and Styrene Using in Situ NIR Spectroscopy: Temperature Effects on Monomer Sequence and Morphology

Abstract: The living anionic copolymerization of isoprene (I) and styrene (S) can afford a variety of different polymer microstructures that strongly depend on experimental parameters such as solvent, counterion, and temperature. In this work, in situ near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy was employed as a versatile and fast method to track the conversion of the individual monomers in a nonpolar (cyclohexane, CyH) and a coordinative solvent mixture (CyH with 1.5% vol tetrahydrofuran (THF)). For the first time, in situ monito… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the P(I‐ co ‐S) is not capable of bridging vitrified PS domains, it affects the tensile strength in the P(I‐ co ‐S)/P(I‐ co ‐S) n blend at elongations far beyond ε break of the brittle P(I‐ co ‐S) material. This improved σ(ε) is tentatively explained by the increased T g,PS‐rich (100 °C vs 80 °C) [ 18,47 ] and M n (240 kg mol −1 vs 80 kg mol −1 ) of P(I‐ co ‐S) in the partially macrophase separated blend (cf. Tables S1 and S2, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the P(I‐ co ‐S) is not capable of bridging vitrified PS domains, it affects the tensile strength in the P(I‐ co ‐S)/P(I‐ co ‐S) n blend at elongations far beyond ε break of the brittle P(I‐ co ‐S) material. This improved σ(ε) is tentatively explained by the increased T g,PS‐rich (100 °C vs 80 °C) [ 18,47 ] and M n (240 kg mol −1 vs 80 kg mol −1 ) of P(I‐ co ‐S) in the partially macrophase separated blend (cf. Tables S1 and S2, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the P(I-co-S) is not capable of bridging vitrified PS domains, it affects the tensile strength in the P(I-co-S)/P(I-co-S) n blend at elongations far beyond ε break of the brittle P(I-co-S) material. This improved σ(ε) is tentatively explained by the increased T g,PS-rich (100 °C vs 80 °C) [18,47] and M n (240 kg mol −1 vs 80 kg mol −1 ) of P(I-co-S) in the partially macrophase separated blend (cf. Tables S1 and S2, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For the synthesis of the tapered copolymers of isoprene and styrene, the procedure described in refs. [11,13] and shown in Scheme 1 was followed. Table 1 contains the theoretical values for the molar fraction of isoprene for each copolymer (x isoprene th ), as well as the molar fraction as determined by 1 H NMR spectra (Figure 1).…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known from the previous works, that the PS standard typically overestimates the molecular weights of P(Ico-S) copolymers. [11][12][13] In addition, errors caused by dosing, due to the low amounts of initiator, and irreversible termination of Table 1. Characterization data of synthesized tapered copolymers of isoprene and styrene with varying monomer ratio and molecular weight.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%