King Vision video laryngoscope versus Lightwand as an intubating device in adult patients with Mallampatti grade III and IV patients

Kamal, Shadab; Ali, Qazi Ehsan; Amir, Syed Hussain; Ahmed, Sarfaraz; Pal, Krochi

doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.05.027

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It provides high quality image of airway structure which is displayed on a video screen to facilitate visualization [11]. It is an indirect laryngoscope that provides a view of the glottis without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Study of Intubation Performance between Macintosh, the Channeled King Vision and the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope in Controlled Hypertensive Patients

Mogahed¹,

Elghamri²,

Anwar³

2017

J Anesth Clin Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Study of Intubation Performance between Macintosh, the Channeled King Vision and the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope in Controlled Hypertensive Patients

Mogahed¹,

Elghamri²,

Anwar³

2017

J Anesth Clin Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ILMA was used successfully to intubate obese patient [5]. Several studies used King vision successfully to intubate patients with different Mallampati score [7][8][9].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kamal et al [7] compared KV with Lightwand for intubation of patients with Mallampatti grade 3 and 4 and found that the mean time for intubation with KV was 19.50 ± 6.73 s (ours was 17.96 ± 5.12 s) Alvis et al [9] compared the McGrath MAC and KV for intubation of patients with normal airways and reported that first attempt success rate with KV was 77% (24 of 31 attempts) and hypoxic episode (SpO 2 less than 90%) occurred in 3 patients (9%) (Our result showed that all patients in KV group were intubated in the 1st attempt and no patients suffered from hypoxic episodes).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

King Vision vs. Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) For Intubation of Obese Patients

Marouf¹,

Khalil²

2017

J Anesth Clin Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The following criteria were used for calculation of sample size: 95% confidence and 80% power. Sample size and power of analysis was calculated on the basis of previous study[ 5 6 ] to detect 20% difference in hemodynamic as BP and HR, it was necessary to include 37 patients per group, Therefore, we decided to recruit 40 patients per group to compensate for those dropping out during the study. The Windows version of SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) is an indirect laryngoscope, which produces glottis visualization without vertical alignment axes of the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal structures. [ 5 ]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of King's vision videolaryngoscope and glidescope on hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

Elshmaa

2020

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims: We hypothesis that the use of novel airway devices would decrease hemodynamic stress response (HDSR) to laryngoscopy and endotracheal (ET) intubation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the hemodynamic stress response (HDSR) to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation using the King vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) versus glidescope (GLS). Material and Methods: A prospective randomized, comparative study that was conducted on 80 patients of both sexes; American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II with no anticipated difficult airway, aged 20–60 years; who were scheduled for elective surgical procedure under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups (40 each). Group I: laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were carried out using KVVL, Group II: laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were carried out using GLS. The two groups were compared for noninvasive hemodynamic data such as heart rate and mean arterial pressure. Time to successful intubation and number of attempts were recorded. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at the preinduction, after induction, at intubation, 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min. Results: There was significant decrease ( P < 0.05) in HR and MBP in both groups just before intubation. In comparison with the baseline, HR and MBP in group I and group II increased but this difference was not significant at 3 min and 5 min after intubation and returned to the baseline at 10 min after intubation and below the baseline at 15 min after intubation. Also, there were no significant differences in the hemodynamic response between the studied groups. Conclusion: Novel airway devices either KVVL or GLS are efficient in reducing HDSR to laryngoscopy and ET intubation.

show abstract

King Vision video laryngoscope versus Lightwand as an intubating device in adult patients with Mallampatti grade III and IV patients

Cited by 9 publications

References 16 publications

Comparative Study of Intubation Performance between Macintosh, the Channeled King Vision and the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope in Controlled Hypertensive Patients

Comparative Study of Intubation Performance between Macintosh, the Channeled King Vision and the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope in Controlled Hypertensive Patients

King Vision vs. Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) For Intubation of Obese Patients

Evaluation of King's vision videolaryngoscope and glidescope on hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About