Oberstufe Aus Schülersicht 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-03636-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Klassenwiederholung und individuelle Förderung in der Sekundarstufe I und II: Theoretische und empirische Zugänge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also worth highlighting a number of findings from German interview studies that support our results. Palowski, Boller, and Müller (2013), for example, found that some parents reproach their children for not meeting the promotion criteria and that some students reported that they felt abandoned by their former teachers when they were told about the retention. Furthermore, Boller, Möller, and Palowski (2013) showed that it was, in particular, students with lower academic self-concepts and who lacked support from their families who perceived their retention as a personal setback and that most of the detrimental effects of retention that students reported related to their motivation in school.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth highlighting a number of findings from German interview studies that support our results. Palowski, Boller, and Müller (2013), for example, found that some parents reproach their children for not meeting the promotion criteria and that some students reported that they felt abandoned by their former teachers when they were told about the retention. Furthermore, Boller, Möller, and Palowski (2013) showed that it was, in particular, students with lower academic self-concepts and who lacked support from their families who perceived their retention as a personal setback and that most of the detrimental effects of retention that students reported related to their motivation in school.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. Helsper et al, 2006Helsper et al, , 2009Palowski, Boller & Müller, 2013;Krüger & Deppe, 2014;Kuhnen & Palowski, 2018;Fiedler-Ebke, 2020;Türkyilmaz, 2021;überblicksartig: Eder & Paseka, 2021;Harring, Rohlfs & Palentien, 2021), sollte auch deshalb wieder stärker in den Fokus rücken, um differenzielle Schulumwelten und milieuspezifische und auch milieuunspezifische Wahrnehmungsschemata in Bezug auf Schule und Bildung, kurz auf die Art und Weise der Vermittlung, die sich nicht nur in didaktischmethodischen Settings erschöpft, angemessen zu erfassen. Zusammengefasst wird hier für eine differenzierte und differenzorientierte Forschungslinie innerhalb der quantitativen ungleichheitsbezogenen Bildungsforschung plädiert, die sich wieder für Fragestellungen jenseits von Fachleistungen und individuellen Bildungsentscheidungen öffnet und Schulen als "pädagogische Handlungseinheiten" (Fend, 1998) oder als spezifische "Institutionen-Milieu-Komplexe" (Helsper, 2008) in den Blick nimmt, die mehr sind als Anstalten der Wissensvermittlung in den sogenannten Kernfächern.…”
Section: Ausblickunclassified