Knowledge Innovation Mechanism Based on Linkages between Core Knowledge and Periphery Knowledge: The Case of R&amp;D Cooperation between Latecomers and Forerunners

Li, Weibao; Li, Xiaoli; Wei, Weiwei

doi:10.1155/2022/8417784

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With the rise of the global knowledge economy, innovation has become a crucial component for organizations to get a competitive edge and demonstrate exceptional performance (Li et al, 2022), and the implementation and utilization of KM are too (Hassan & Raziq, 2019). Previous studies have identified a positive relationship between KM and innovation (Du Plessis, 2007;Gardeazabal et al, 2023;Honarpour et al, 2018;Mardani et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality, Knowledge, and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Search and Bibliometric Analysis

Ciptono

Noviasari

2023

Binus Business Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation is closely associated with quality and Knowledge Management (KM). However, there still needs to be more consensus on the nature of the relationship. Therefore, it is an opportunity to contribute further to the literature on innovation management studies. The research mapped research developments in quality management, knowledge management, and innovation management from Scopus Database in an integrative and comprehensive manner using Microsoft Excel, Mendeley, and VOSviewer to conduct a bibliometric analysis. With PRISMA Flow Diagram in carrying out a systematic search, the research managed to capture 140 research articles on related topics published between 2002 and 2022. Through a systematic search and bibliometric analysis, the research identified, described, and characterized the origins, evolution, and intellectual structures of scientific knowledge associated with quality, knowledge, and innovation in management. For the results, the research underlines a lack of systematic efforts to develop a sound theoretical framework of the subject matters. The literature still lacks evidence concerning reference models and critical factors which can contribute to effective and efficient integration of quality, knowledge, and innovation, especially in the management field. At the end of the research, a framework is proposed to broaden the perspective of quality management practices that are not limited to Total Quality Management (TQM). The research result drives future studies to determine reciprocal relationships between TQM and KM and how this affinity can impact innovation.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality, Knowledge, and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Search and Bibliometric Analysis

Ciptono

Noviasari

2023

Binus Business Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Interpretation of course conceptual structure and student self-efficacy: an integrated strategy of knowledge graphs with item response modeling

Cao,

Lin,

Feng

2024

BMC Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background There is a scarcity of studies that quantitatively assess the difficulty and importance of knowledge points (KPs) depending on students’ self-efficacy for learning (SEL). This study aims to validate the practical application of psychological measurement tools in physical therapy education by analyzing student SEL and course conceptual structure. Methods From the “Therapeutic Exercise” course curriculum, we extracted 100 KPs and administered a difficulty rating questionnaire to 218 students post-final exam. The pipeline of the non-parametric Item Response Theory (IRT) and parametric IRT modeling was employed to estimate student SEL and describe the hierarchy of KPs in terms of item difficulty. Additionally, Gaussian Graphical Models with Non-Convex Penalties were deployed to create a Knowledge Graph (KG) and identify the main components. A visual analytics approach was then proposed to understand the correlation and difficulty level of KPs. Results We identified 50 KPs to create the Mokken scale, which exhibited high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.9675) with no gender bias at the overall or at each item level (p > 0.05). The three-parameter logistic model (3PLM) demonstrated good fitness with questionnaire data, whose Root Mean Square Error Approximation was < 0.05. Also, item-model fitness unveiled good fitness, as indicated by each item with non-significant p-values for chi-square tests. The Wright map revealed item difficulty relative to SEL levels. SEL estimated by the 3PLM correlated significantly with the high-ability range of average Grade-Point Average (p < 0.05). The KG backbone structure consisted of 58 KPs, with 29 KPs overlapping with the Mokken scale. Visual analysis of the KG backbone structure revealed that the difficulty level of KPs in the IRT could not replace their position parameters in the KG. Conclusion The IRT and KG methods utilized in this study offer distinct perspectives for visualizing hierarchical relationships and correlations among the KPs. Based on real-world teaching empirical data, this study helps to provide a research foundation for updating course contents and customizing learning objectives. Trial registration Not applicable.

show abstract

Knowledge Innovation Mechanism Based on Linkages between Core Knowledge and Periphery Knowledge: The Case of R&D Cooperation between Latecomers and Forerunners

Cited by 2 publications

References 44 publications

Quality, Knowledge, and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Search and Bibliometric Analysis

Quality, Knowledge, and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Search and Bibliometric Analysis

Interpretation of course conceptual structure and student self-efficacy: an integrated strategy of knowledge graphs with item response modeling

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About