Knowledge Management in Startups: Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

Abstract

This paper conducts a systematic literature review on knowledge management (KM) in the context of startups in order to analyze the state of the art, identify research gaps and define a future research agenda. The main findings highlight that, even though there is an increasing number of papers on the topic of KM in startups, several issues are still neglected. Specifically, the paper identifies four main gaps in the body of literature. The first gap deals with the environmental and socio-political factors influencing the adoption of KM in startups. The second gap regards the lack of a comprehensive taxonomy of knowledge management systems (KMSs) that may support the processes of knowledge creation, acquisition, storage, transfer, sharing and application. This second gap allows us to identify a third gap concerning the level of alignment between startup's strategies and technologies adopted. Finally, the fourth gap deals with the issue of the impact of KM on startup's performances with regard to economic, financial, market, technical, technological, organizational, human and relational performance. From these four gaps, six research questions (RQs) have been proposed. These RQs allow us to identify possible areas of analysis to define a future research agenda. Neglecting these issues means underestimating all the possible advantages of KM adoption for a startup to achieve efficiency, effectiveness and scalability goals.

Knowledge Creation Process and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: the Role of Technological Innovation Capabilities

“…From a resource-advantage perspective, knowledge is characteristically tacit, non-dynamic, and is difficult to transfer or disseminate [7]. Therefore, businesses should create knowledge to produce innovations, such as technologies and products, thereby translating their knowledge resources into SCAs [10]. In summary, research on the mechanism in the relationship between knowledge creation and SCA formation requires greater rigor and greater depth.…”

An Ontology-Based Knowledge Modelling for a Sustainability Assessment Domain

“…Continuously, new areas are added depending on market demands. The remaining domains refer to the tourism sector [40], SMEs sector [84] and food and housing [81].…”

“…Similar to measures, these properties are covered by methods [15,80], frameworks [43,78] and indicators [12,29]. The additional properties were derived from [8,67] using questionnaires [90], desk-analysis and semi-structured interviews [84] and surveys [12]. Using experts to gather data was explained in [66,86].…”

Decisions on Remanufacturing with WTP Disparity and Recycling Competition under Government Subsidies

“…Based on the research methods by Cerchioneand Esposito [11], Centobelli et al [12] and Centobelli et al [13], the review of literature focuses on some fundamental concepts such as "remanufacturing", "consumer willingness to pay", "competition", and"government subsidies", to mention just a few. In the first part of the literature review, we present the relationship among remanufacturing supply chain members when consumer willingness to pay is considered.…”