2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0272263113000624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge of Nativelike Selections in a L2

Abstract: It is well established that part of native speaker competence resides in knowledge of conventionalized word combinations, or nativelike selections (NLSs). This article reports an investigation into the receptive NLS knowledge of second language (L2) users of English in both the United Kingdom and Poland and the influence of a variety of independent variables on this knowledge. Results indicate that only an early start (< 12 years old) in an immersion setting guarantees nativelikeness. Long exposure in late … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current experiment, however, used a within-subject counterbalanced design (i.e., every participant produced both phrases from each pair) because a between-subject design is less suitable for NNSs. That is, it is more difficult to match two different NNS groups on all variables known to affect L2 attainment, such as memory (e.g., Foster, Bolibaugh, & Kotula, 2014) and aptitude (DeKeyser, 2000). Thus, these methodological dissimilarities may have contributed to the incongruent results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current experiment, however, used a within-subject counterbalanced design (i.e., every participant produced both phrases from each pair) because a between-subject design is less suitable for NNSs. That is, it is more difficult to match two different NNS groups on all variables known to affect L2 attainment, such as memory (e.g., Foster, Bolibaugh, & Kotula, 2014) and aptitude (DeKeyser, 2000). Thus, these methodological dissimilarities may have contributed to the incongruent results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critically, they are an integral part of the mental lexicon on a par with single words and have thus been claimed to be fundamental building blocks of language (Arnon, McCauley, & Christiansen, ; Arnon & Snider, ; Christiansen & Chater, ; Elman, ; Wray, ). Yet, as a great many studies can attest, L2 learners often experience considerable difficulties acquiring and using multi‐word expressions in speech and writing (Foster, Bolibaugh, & Kotula, ; Wray, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instruments 6 and 7: formulaic language Even though L2 learners (as well as L1 learners) rely on prefabricated linguistic chunks in early language development, the idiomatic use of formulaic language has been shown to be one of the greatest difficulties for (even very advanced) L2 speakers (e.g., Erman, Forsberg Lundell & Lewis, 2018;Foster, Bolibaugh & Kotula, 2014;Granena & Long, 2013;Wray, 2005). The present study included one test of idioms (Instrument 6) and one test of proverbs (Instrument 7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%