Korea Brain Initiative: Emerging Issues and Institutionalization of Neuroethics

Jeong, Sung‐Jin; Lee, In Young; Jun, Bang Ook; Ryu, Young-Joon; Sohn, Jung Woo; Kim, Sung-Phil; Woo, Choong‐Wan; Koo, Ja Wook; Cho, Il‐Joo; Oh, Uhtaek; Kim, Kyungjin; Suh, Pann‐Ghill

doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.042

Cited by 19 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The institutionalization of neuroethics in Korea is an integral component of the Korea Brain Initiative within neuroscience research [22]. A historical case study of the institutionalization of laboratory work in Japan from the 1880s to the 1930s is performed [23].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutionalization Patterns in Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry

Yaneva¹,

Dimitrova²,

Ivanov³

et al. 2022

JofIMAB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The objective of the present study is to analyze scientometrically some essential patterns of the dynamic science institutionalization on breast cancer immunohistochemistry and to outline the most significant scientists, journals, scientific institutions conference proceedings in this interdisciplinary field. Material/Methods: In December 2019, a retrospective problem-oriented, title-word based search was performed in Web of Science Core Collection (WoS), MEDLINE and BIOSIS Citation Index (BIOSIS) of Web of Knowledge as well as in Scopus for 2003-2018. The following parameters were comparatively assessed: annual dynamics of publications, author’s names, journal titles, scientific institutions, and scientific forums. Results: There were 1187 publications abstracted in WoS, 776 publications abstracted in BIOSIS, 711 publications abstracted in Scopus, and 616 publications abstracted in MEDLINE. There were journal articles in 288 journals abstracted in WoS, in 234 journals abstracted in MEDLINE, in 156 journals abstracted in Scopus, and in 140 journals abstracted in BIOSIS. The most productive authors were David G. Hicks, Rohit Bhargava and Ian O. Ellis. The ‘core’ journals were Modern Pathology, Laboratory Investigation and Cancer Research. The most influential scientific institutions were the University of Texas System (USA) and the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (USA). The annual meetings of the US and Canadian Academy of Pathology and the Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer symposia were most attractive to the investigators worldwide. Conclusion:Our comprehensive results could be of interest to breast cancer researchers and clinicians from smaller countries, institutional science managers, and journal editors.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutionalization Patterns in Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry

Yaneva¹,

Dimitrova²,

Ivanov³

et al. 2022

JofIMAB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The history of the institutionalization of asylum and forensic psychiatry in Bucharest during the XIX th century is also described (28). The institutionalization of neuroethics in Korea is an integral component of Korea's Brain Initiative within the neuroscience research (29).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A scientometric approach of dynamic science institutionalization in the field of laparoscopic proctocolectomy

Kirov¹

2019

J Clin Invest Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This scientometric study analyzed the dynamic institutionalization of research on laparoscopic proctocolectomy and outlined the most significant institutions, scientists, journals and conference proceedings. A retrospective problem-oriented, title-word based search was done in Web of Science Core Collection (WoS), MEDLINE and BIOSIS Citation Index (BIOSIS) between 2008-2017. The following parameters were comparatively assessed: the annual dynamics of publications; the languages of publications; the authors; the journals; the scientific institutions; the scientific forums and citations received. There were 3,393 publications abstracted in WoS, 5,209-in MEDLINE and only 488-in BIOSIS. The papers were abstracted in WoS by researchers from 65 countries, whereas in BIOSISby researchers from 37 countries. There were 23 languages of publications in MEDLINE, 11 in WoS and 7 in BIOSIS. The journal Dis. Colon Rectum contained most of the papers abstracted on this topic. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation was the most influential scientific institution. The annual meetings of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons attracted the attention of most scientists all around the world. The paper by M.H. van der Pas et al. (Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14:210-218) received 393 citations in WoS. This comprehensive factual information could be properly used by coloproctologists in smaller countries and institutional science managers.

show abstract

“…The importance of neuroethics can be observed through several national brain initiatives. The emphasis on neuroethics by the Korea Brain Initiative comes alongside its priority in advancing neuroscientific research (Jeong et al 2019). Similar to this, in line with its developmental objectives for the neurotechnological industry, the Australian Brain Initiative regards neuroethics as vital in ensuring its success (Carter et al 2019).…”

Section: Relevance and Importancementioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping out the Trajectory of Islamic Perspectives on Neuroethics

Noorfuad

2022

ABR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The advancements of medical technology incited multi-disciplinary discussions with regard to its ethical implications. Within the neuroscientific domain, the term ‘neuroethics’ has gained prominence over recent years. However, the contributions of religious perspectives in the nascent field of neuroethics are particularly few. The scarce literature on Islamic perspectives on neuroethics merely questioned its importance and introduced a sharia-based framework that can be implemented. Building upon this, the possible trajectories of Islamic perspectives on neuroethics can be mapped out by tapping into several issues within Islamic bioethics, such as cloning and genomics. Topics such as these are deliberated through the collective discussions by contemporary Muslim scholars and biomedical scientists, thus producing well-informed dialogues and decisions. Building upon these may assist in developing further the Islamic perspectives on issues within neuroethics. This lays the groundwork for all the stakeholders involved in advance, in order to predict and prevent potential harms and challenges.

show abstract

Korea Brain Initiative: Emerging Issues and Institutionalization of Neuroethics

Cited by 19 publications

References 4 publications

Institutionalization Patterns in Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry

Institutionalization Patterns in Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry

A scientometric approach of dynamic science institutionalization in the field of laparoscopic proctocolectomy

Mapping out the Trajectory of Islamic Perspectives on Neuroethics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About