2017
DOI: 10.17243/mavk.2017.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kuvikvédelem egy közép-magyarországi mezőgazdasági területen: költési adatok és a mesterséges fészekodvak paramétereinek összefüggései

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally it breeds in the lowlands, but for the above mentioned reasons nowadays it breeds mainly in anthropogenic environments, like on the loft of farmland houses, agricultural buildings and abandoned old houses (Hámori 2016(Hámori , 2017. Because of the lack of studies, the size of the Hungarian population is not exactly known (Šálek et al 2013), but it is likely to be higher than the data reported in the literature (Magyar et al 1998, Schmidt 1998, Hadarics & Zalai 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally it breeds in the lowlands, but for the above mentioned reasons nowadays it breeds mainly in anthropogenic environments, like on the loft of farmland houses, agricultural buildings and abandoned old houses (Hámori 2016(Hámori , 2017. Because of the lack of studies, the size of the Hungarian population is not exactly known (Šálek et al 2013), but it is likely to be higher than the data reported in the literature (Magyar et al 1998, Schmidt 1998, Hadarics & Zalai 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high diversity of the Upper Kiskunság Puszta is mainly due to the mosaic habitat structure, the dense network of livestock farms and the high proportion of grasslands managed by traditional extensive methods. Here, half of the nest boxes (N = 6) were located in Juhászföld and Ürbőpuszta belonging to the outer region of Bugyi city, which had high breeding outputs compared to other nets boxes between 2012 and 2016 with 4.63 successfully fledged owlets per nest box (Hámori 2017a). This also demonstrates that the area provides excellent habitat conditions for the Little Owls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Detailed studies on feeding biology are also essential in Central Europe to support nature conservation strategies. In Hungary, Little Owl feeding data are mostly pre-millenial or based on small number samples (Greschik 1911, 1924, Marián & Schmidt 1968, Molnár 1984, Andrési & Sódor 1986, Endes 1990, and only in some cases seasonal or fully processed (Lanszki 2006, Hámori et al 2017a. In this respect, the Little Owl is one of the least studied owls in Hungary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study area is part of the Hungarian Plain, with large, extensively grazed grasslands. Therefore, we hypothesise that loss of suitable feeding habitats is not a significant threatening factor considering the local Little Owl population, contrary to other regions throughout Europe and even in Hungary (Gorman 1995, Hadarics & Zalai 2008, Van Nieuwenhuyse et al 2008, Framis et al 2011, BirdLife International 2016, Šálek et al 2016, Hámori 2017a. Accordingly, it is the amount of available nesting sites which limits the population, forming a serious obstacle towards further population growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Typical nesting sites are the lofts of farm-houses and barns (Schmidt 1998). The estimated size of the Hungarian Little Owl population is approximately 1,500-4,000 breeding pairs, and the population tendencies are considered to be negative (Gorman 1995, Hadarics & Zalai 2008, BirdLife International 2016, Hámori 2017a. The main threatening factors are: a) the lack of proper nesting sites as modern buildings are less sufficient for breeding (Orbán 1985), b) the significant increase in the abundance of the Beech Marten (Martes foina), which is one of the main predators of the Little Owl (Kalotás 1987), c) the indirect effect of rodenticides, d) the abandonment of pastures, e) increased mortality of juveniles by suffocation in drinking Unauthenticated Download Date | 5/13/18 4:48 AM troughs (Génot 1991) and by f) falling in chimneys and other unescapable places (Clech 1993, Zvářal 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%