“…Scale bar: each division = 10mm. Drawings : (a), (b) and (d) after Brandherm 2007a; (c) after Gallay 1988; (e) after Cordier and Gruet 1975Fig 7Monte Sa Idda type: distribution of variants. Key: =variant Villaverde del Río (list 12); =variant Alcalá del Río (list 13); =variant Boom (list 14); =variant undetermined (list 15)Fig 8Miscellaneous and undetermined carp's-tongue weapons: distribution.…”
Section: Carp's-tongue Sword Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scale bar: each division = 10mm. Drawings : (a), (b) and (d) after Brandherm 2007a; (c) after Gallay 1988; (e) after Cordier and Gruet 1975…”
Engaging with both typological and contextual approaches, this paper endeavours to take a fresh look at one of the most emblematic groups of Atlantic Late Bronze Age metalwork depositions. Taking a revised typo-chronology for carp's-tongue swords as a starting point, we compare single-piece deposition of these items with their occurrence in hoards of mixed composition. Clear regional trends emerge as a result. We also contrast the composition of carp's-tongue hoards on both sides of the English Channel, highlighting the impact that poorly defined key types can have on our perception of an entire complex of metalwork assemblages. Overall, the composition of carp's-tongue hoards proves rather uniform across this geographical divide. Some noteworthy differences, however, can be discerned between British and French assemblages.
“…Scale bar: each division = 10mm. Drawings : (a), (b) and (d) after Brandherm 2007a; (c) after Gallay 1988; (e) after Cordier and Gruet 1975Fig 7Monte Sa Idda type: distribution of variants. Key: =variant Villaverde del Río (list 12); =variant Alcalá del Río (list 13); =variant Boom (list 14); =variant undetermined (list 15)Fig 8Miscellaneous and undetermined carp's-tongue weapons: distribution.…”
Section: Carp's-tongue Sword Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scale bar: each division = 10mm. Drawings : (a), (b) and (d) after Brandherm 2007a; (c) after Gallay 1988; (e) after Cordier and Gruet 1975…”
Engaging with both typological and contextual approaches, this paper endeavours to take a fresh look at one of the most emblematic groups of Atlantic Late Bronze Age metalwork depositions. Taking a revised typo-chronology for carp's-tongue swords as a starting point, we compare single-piece deposition of these items with their occurrence in hoards of mixed composition. Clear regional trends emerge as a result. We also contrast the composition of carp's-tongue hoards on both sides of the English Channel, highlighting the impact that poorly defined key types can have on our perception of an entire complex of metalwork assemblages. Overall, the composition of carp's-tongue hoards proves rather uniform across this geographical divide. Some noteworthy differences, however, can be discerned between British and French assemblages.
“…Les exemples angevins 15 , provenant de Baugé, du Guédéniau (fig. 6, n° 10), du dépôt de Pierre Cou à Chalonnes-sur-Loire 16 et ceux présumés venir de la région de Saumur 17 (fig. 6, n° 11 et 12), possèdent des dimensions et des morphologies diverses (fig.…”
Cette note présente une pointe de lance découverte fortuitement à Ouzilly, dans la Vienne. L'objet, dont la répartition du type est principalement armoricaine et normande, se rattache au type de Tréboul. Ce type de pointe de lance est surtout représenté pendant l'horizon du même nom, de l'étape 1 du Bronze moyen, mais perdure avec quelques variantes typologiques au cours de l'étape 2 du Bronze moyen. La pointe de lance d'Ouzilly, par certaines de ses caractéristiques, se rapproche davantage des exemplaires de la transition du Bronze moyen 1 au Bronze moyen 2, voire du tout début du Bronze moyen 2. Elle s'inscrit dans un contexte chronologique et culturel relativement peu documenté en Poitou.
Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 21 avril 2019. Tous droits réservés Ni du Hallstatt, ni de La Tène, mais du Moyen Âge, ou les pièges de la stylis...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
