2009
DOI: 10.3917/rfap.127.0591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

... la pertinence des « indicateurs mondiaux de la gouvernance » : un débat scientifique en cours

Abstract: Depuis 1996, la Banque mondiale et son département de recherche ont développé six indicateurs dénommés « Indicateurs mondiaux de la gouvernance » (IMG) pour mesurer la qualité des pays. S’appuyant sur une analyse de la littérature scientifique existante ainsi que sur la collecte de données brutes, c et article montre que les enjeux conceptuels et empiriques liés à la construction d’indicateurs sur la gouvernance posent des questions. En effet, procéder avec exactitude à une comparaison de la gouvernance entre … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elaborated method, in this work, is part of the methods that use linear programming, such as benefit-of-doubt model and synthetic indicator, proposed by Melyn and Moesen, with the exception that it performs aggregation and standardization of indicators simultaneously resulting in the standardized composite indicator. The elaborated standardized composite index is also different from indicators of the World Bank, which are based on perceptions rather than clear data (Apaza, 2008). In addition, these indicators do not respect the principle of discriminant validity (Langbein & Knack, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The elaborated method, in this work, is part of the methods that use linear programming, such as benefit-of-doubt model and synthetic indicator, proposed by Melyn and Moesen, with the exception that it performs aggregation and standardization of indicators simultaneously resulting in the standardized composite indicator. The elaborated standardized composite index is also different from indicators of the World Bank, which are based on perceptions rather than clear data (Apaza, 2008). In addition, these indicators do not respect the principle of discriminant validity (Langbein & Knack, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the variables incorporated in the composite index are not very numerous. However, this diminishes the main criticisms addressed to composite indicators, namely the fact of obscuring the source factors of governance, when a lot of variables are grouped (Apaza, 2008). In the same vein, composite indexes elaborated from great number of variables may not capture the interdependence of indicators, ignore important dimensions that are difficult to measure, and hide weaknesses in some components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2022). According toHoang et al (2022), these variables are good indicators of the attractiveness of foreign direct investment Apaza (2008). de nes indicators for measuring institutional quality by grouping them into six good governance indices, as described byKaufmann et al (2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%