La valoración de los daños arqueológicos y la justicia cautelar en el proceso penal.

Valdés, Antonio Roma

doi:10.33349/2012.82.3307

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In Spain, at least, the phrase 'incalculable value', the response traditionally given by archaeologists when asked to appraise objects found outside the antiquities market or to assess a site's destruction, was redolent of the aforementioned Crocian idealism [21] (p. 71). In Spanish legal practice, one doctrinal camp embraced the concept, after eliminating its nihilistic note, for an eminently practical reason: to move beyond the reference to material values when it came to classifying harmful acts affecting archaeological objects as felonies rather than misdemeanours.…”

Section: Assessment Methods and Criteria: Case Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although clearly intended to solve a practical problem, this proposal has not ultimately eliminated the need to assess the economic value of the damage, as in the absence of such a valuation it would not be possible to pursue a liability claim against the responsible parties. If the value of the damage is omitted, one runs the risk of its being considered unusual damage, in which case any claim for civil liability would be inadmissible [21,24]. Consequently, today, the expression "incalculable value" is used only residually, for exceptional cases in which economic criteria cannot be applied [8] (pp.…”

Section: Assessment Methods and Criteria: Case Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing Damage to Archaeological Heritage in Criminal and Administrative Proceedings

Temiño

2019

Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The economic assessment of damage to movable and immovable objects considered part of archaeological heritage is a matter of increasing interest, both at the legal level and in terms of government management. The primary reason for this interest is the urgent need to agree on a sound and reliable approach to economically quantifying not so much the cultural value of the damage caused as the civil liability for having caused it in those cases in which it was produced by a harmful human act. Assessment methods require a broad consensus to be considered reliable. The lack of consideration given to this matter has only made the absence of such a consensus more acute. This paper offers a mainly Spanish case-based analysis of the most common valuation methods for both movable and immovable archaeological objects. With regard to movable objects, it examines the problems involved in both the exclusive use of an object’s market price as its cultural value and the lack of justification for the chosen valuation system, concluding that current methods are insufficient. This insufficiency, also perceived by the authors of the expert reports used in the analyzed proceedings, has been dealt with arbitrarily. With regard to immovable object, it concludes that the systems currently used to assess the damage to sites are likewise insufficient, despite having been legally acknowledged in some cases. This paper will thus examine the methods used in environmental assessments—whose parallels with archaeological heritage are clear—and proposes that they be adapted for this purpose.

show abstract

Section: Assessment Methods and Criteria: Case Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Assessment Methods and Criteria: Case Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Damage to Archaeological Heritage in Criminal and Administrative Proceedings

Temiño

2019

Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Un problema en la determinación de esta cuantía se explica cuando se producen daños en yacimientos arqueológicos, con afectación al contexto cultural (Carballo Arceo, Domínguez Tedín 2007;Grau Lobo 2009;Roma 2012;Romeo Marugán 2018). En este sentido, destacar que la destrucción del contexto implica la producción de un delito de daños, de acuerdo con el art.…”

Section: La Pericia Sobre Objetos Culturalesunclassified

El objeto cultural en la investigación y enjuiciamiento de los delitos: manipulación, cadena de custodia, pericia y destino

Valdés¹

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El objeto cultural en la investigación y enjuiciamiento de los delitos: manipulación, cadena de custodia, pericia y destino The cultural object during the investigation and trial of crimes: manipulation, chain of custody, expertise and destination Antonio Roma ValdésEl carácter cultural del objeto determina en la tramitación de los procedimientos penales unas consecuencias que exigen un cuidado en su tratamiento por parte de quienes intervienen en ellos, a saber, los integrantes de las unidades policiales, los ministerios públicos y los tribunales. Este tratamiento no solo se refiere a la manipulación física del objeto, sino también a las cautelas que obligan las reglas procesales a través fundamentalmente de la llamada cadena de custodia, así como las derivadas de la normativa cultural. En el presente trabajo se exponen las reglas para manipular el objeto en la investigación y la sanción de las infracciones sobre el patrimonio cultural, además de las bases jurídicas para proyectar hacia el futuro los valores culturales de estos objetos.Palabras clave: patrimonio cultural, Derecho Penal, infracciones, investigación criminal, cooperación internacional en materia penal.The cultural nature of objects determine the consequences in judicial procedures as they require particular attention and treatment by the professionals taking part in criminal proceedings, notably members of law enforcement, pubic ministries and the courts. This treatment refers not only to their physical handling, but also to the functions that follow the procedural rules throughout the so-called chain of custody, as well as those deriving from cultural regulations. This study reveals the rules of their handling during investigations, the sanctions for cultural heritage infractions and the judicial foundations that project the cultural value of these objects toward the future

show abstract

La valoración de los daños arqueológicos y la justicia cautelar en el proceso penal.

Abstract: Resumen no disponible

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Assessing Damage to Archaeological Heritage in Criminal and Administrative Proceedings

Assessing Damage to Archaeological Heritage in Criminal and Administrative Proceedings

El objeto cultural en la investigación y enjuiciamiento de los delitos: manipulación, cadena de custodia, pericia y destino

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About