“…All other elemental abundances are therefore assessed against the fixed Si (21 wt %; Prettyman et al, 2006) and are expressed as elemental ratios (i.e., Mg/Si and Al/Si). This normalisation largely cancels out inaccuracies in the results caused by calibration uncertainties and variations in XRF intensity that are related to physical and compositional heterogeneities in the regolith (Clark and Trombka, 1997;Maruyama et al, 2008;Näränen et al, 2008;Weider et al, 2011). Theoretical and experimental investigations of XRF geometry effects (e.g., Maruyama et al, 2008;Näränen et al, 2008;Parvianen et al, 2011;Weider et al, 2011) have shown that it can be problematic to express XRF-derived abundances as ratios of two elements that differ significantly in energy (e.g., Si and Fe).…”