2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17370-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory versus wild populations: the importance of population origin in aquatic ecotoxicology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reproducibility in data outcomes has been reported for regulatory testing for some time (Berry, 2014) and is increasingly recognised as a problem in research, most notably in areas of research including neurobiology, behaviour and cognition studies (Gerlai, 2018), epigenetics (Sugden et al ., 2020), population modelling in ecotoxicology (Wang, 2018) and comparisons between laboratory fish models and wild populations (Romero‐Blanco & Alonso, 2022). Reproducibility is known to be affected by differences in housing and husbandry of experimental animals (Lieggi et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproducibility in data outcomes has been reported for regulatory testing for some time (Berry, 2014) and is increasingly recognised as a problem in research, most notably in areas of research including neurobiology, behaviour and cognition studies (Gerlai, 2018), epigenetics (Sugden et al ., 2020), population modelling in ecotoxicology (Wang, 2018) and comparisons between laboratory fish models and wild populations (Romero‐Blanco & Alonso, 2022). Reproducibility is known to be affected by differences in housing and husbandry of experimental animals (Lieggi et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, similar comparative ecotoxicological studies examining sensitivity differences between contaminant-exposed wild and laboratory embryo–larval FHM are not available in the peer-reviewed literature. However, a small number of studies utilizing other model species report similar differences in sensitivity between wild and laboratory populations, though the findings are species and toxicant dependent and concentrate on effects during adult life stages . For example, a study examining the comparative sensitivities wild and laboratory Caenorhabditis elegans found that all four wild strains tested were significantly more sensitivity to copper exposure relative to lab-cultured organisms .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, a small number of studies utilizing other model species report similar differences in sensitivity between wild and laboratory populations, though the findings are species and toxicant dependent and concentrate on effects during adult life stages. 63 For example, a study examining the comparative sensitivities wild and laboratory Caenorhabditis elegans found that all four wild strains tested were significantly more sensitivity to copper exposure relative to lab-cultured organisms. 64 Similarly, wild male bank voles demonstrated a higher relative sensitivity to cadmium exposure when compared with their laboratory-bred counterparts, with potentially important implications for small burrowing mammalian receptors living at contaminated sites, which tend to be among the most important drivers of ecological risk.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same region, D. magna populations isolated from ponds located in agricultural areas presented specific pesticide resistance in line with local management practices (either chlorpyrifos or deltamethrin; Almeida et al, 2021). Romero‐Blanco and Alonso (2022) also noted from database and literature review that the sensitivity of aquatic species to contaminants depended strongly on the origin of populations, with either wild or laboratory‐reared populations being the most tolerant, depending on the chemical. However, the persistence of the most tolerant populations may come not only with a reduction of genetic diversity but also with fitness or physiological costs (Coustau et al, 2000; Jansen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%