Labour and the state in China’s passive revolution

Abstract

This article begins by engaging with some recent attempts to bring the study of the agency of labour into analyses of global capitalism, and argues that these approaches fail to capture the ways in which labour movements impact upon state strategies and, in turn, how this affects the spatial and temporal nature of global capitalist restructuring. Through adopting Antonio Gramsci's concept of passive revolution, the article shows that whilst China has witnessed a significant degree of spontaneous and unorganised labour unrest, the state has been highly active in seeking to forestall the emergence of a politically conscious organised labour movement in ways that have important implications for the mode of China's insertion into the international division of labour. In accordance with Gramsci's framework, this 'revolution from above' should be understood within the framework and the specificity of the international states system. Labour struggles, class formation and the role of the state in these processes are conditioned both by geopolitical rivalry and by the demonstrative effects of earlier cases of successful industrialisation, as well as by examples of resultant labour struggles.China, labour, the state, Gramsci

Participation and Passive Revolution: The Reproduction of Neoliberal Water Governance Mechanisms in Durban, South Africa

“…As a technique for statecraft, passive revolution, involves two discrete but interrelated processes with the same overarching goal (Gray 2010; Thomas 2009a) of “state survival and the reorganisation of identity through which the social relations are reproduced in new forms consonant with capitalist property relations” (Morton 2007:41). In the first instance, passive revolution “serves as ‘revolution from above’, reliant on state‐led initiatives to ensure the political rule of capital in a situation where it is too weak to achieve such aims itself” (Gray 2010:454). Secondly, passive revolution achieves the reinforcement of hegemony by “seeking to both forestall and at the same time adopt subaltern demands, yet without bringing those subaltern groups into the ruling historical bloc” (Gray 2010:454).…”

Passive revolution revisited: From the Prison Notebooks to our ‘great and terrible world’

“…With reference to Scotland, Neil Davidson (2010) has identified a passive revolution occurring even before Gramsci' (Shields, 2006;Gray, 2010;Simon, 2010). Latin America has been an expecially fertile ground for examining the reach of passive revolution (Modonesi, 2014), with analyses ranging from Brazil (Del Roio, 2012), to Mexico (Morton, 2007a and2010a;Hesketh, 2010), to Bolivia (Hesketh and Morton, 2014).…”

Gramsci online? Um estudo preliminar sobre a aplicabilidade das categorias gramscianas ao ciberespaço

“…Dessa forma, a perspectiva do DDC permite rejeitar a homogeneidade e, mais ainda, a transnacionalidade como resultados do pós-Guerra Fria, trazendo para a discussão a existência de distintas temporalidades e níveis de desenvolvimento no panorama internacional. Nesse ponto seguindo Morton (2007Morton ( , 2011 e outros (Gray, 2010;Thomas, 2013), esse trabalho pretende relacionar categorias gramscianas com o DDC. Dentro da obra do próprio Gramsci existem apontamentos para sua visão do sistema internacional que contempla -assim como para Trotsky -o ponto de partida metodológico do "capitalismo em seu desenvolvimento histórico-mundial condicionado internacionalmente" (Allison e Anievas, 2010, p. 473, trad.…”