Labour migration in ASEAN: Indonesian migrant workers in Johor Bahru, Malaysia

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this article is to explain and share about labour migration for employment purposes issues from the perspective of a sending and receiving country in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (Indonesia; sending state and Malaysia; receiving state) on managing the international labour migration between the two countries.Design/methodology/approachThe research adopting “mixed methods”, mixing of quantitative and qualitative data within a single investigation or sustained programme of inquiry. The activity includes collecting primary data in two countries. Data collection is done by distributing questionnaires to migrant workers in the receiving states and used indepth interview to 10 stakeholders in the sending states.FindingsThe protection of migrant workers in Johor Bahru is still weak. The graph shows that Indonesian migrant workers in Johor mostly have their documents kept by their employer. Fisheries sector has the highest percentage of workers whose documents are retained by the employer. Meanwhile the sector in which the worker mostly do not get a weekly one day off is the domestic worker. Overall, this means that Malaysia has to put more attention on the existing regulation in order to create a more comfortable working environment.Originality/valueThis paper observe three parameters such as working hour, who keep the passport of the Indonesian migrant workers and weekly one day off relate to working condition of Indonesian migrant workers.

Rethinking free skilled labour migration policies in CLMV countries: a qualitative systematic review

“…Since the Blueprint was enacted in 2015, many scholars have tended to describe a rational policy reform, free movement and policy change (Petcharamesree, 2016; Chao, 2017; Daovisan et al , 2019; Arisman and Jaya, 2021). A growing body of evidence has demonstrated how policy changes increase the number of migrant across countries, among them Cambodia-Thailand, Lao-Thailand, Myanmar-Thailand and Vietnam-Lao-Thailand.…”

“…A few studies argue the reasonable drivers of the free flow of skilled labour migration policies in CLMV countries (Jones, 2016; Chao, 2017; Jurje and Lavenex, 2018; Chamaratana and Daovisan, 2019; Pholphirul, 2019; Daovisan and Chamaratana, 2020; Gerard and Bal, 2020). Current studies (Ullah et al , 2019) focus on skill deficiencies in receiving countries (Kampan and Tanielian, 2017; Bhula-or, 2021) and the inflow to Thailand (Kaur, 2010; Nguyen, 2013; Arisman and Jaya, 2021), especially from low-income (e.g. Philippines, Indonesia, Myanmar and Vietnam) to high-income countries (e.g.…”

COVID-19 pandemic and the changing views of mobility: the case of Nepal–Malaysia migration corridor

“…Such economic diversification paved the way for job creation and income growth (World Bank, 2022), concurrently attracting more foreign investments and development projects implemented in the country (Solomon et al, 2015). Malaysia is also committed to making a transition from an upper-middle income to a high-income economy by 2024 (see Devadas et al, 2020;World Bank, 2022), though some economic sectors including plantation, agriculture and manufacturing are still heavily dependent on manual, unskilled and low-paid workers (see Hamzah et al, 2020;Arisman & Jaya, 2020;Shahiri et al, 2021).…”

The Development of the Imigrant Community From Java in Batu Pahat, 1957-1966

“…Many Indonesians choose to leave their home areas to other countries that are considered better in the economic field due to the problem of unemployment in Indonesia (Arisman & Jaya, 2020). It happened because of need and want to change life to a more comfortable so willing to repeat every year from Malaysia to Indonesia just to renew the permit (Loganathan, Rui, Ng, & Pocock, 2019).…”