2015
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Landau–Zener evolution under weak measurement: manifestation of the Zeno effect under diabatic and adiabatic measurement protocols

Abstract: The time evolution and the asymptotic outcome of a Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg-Majorana (LZ) process under continuous weak non-selective measurement is analyzed. We compare two measurement protocols in which the populations of either the adiabatic or the non-adiabatic levels are (continuously and weakly) monitored. The weak measurement formalism, described using a Gaussian Kraus operator, leads to a time evolution characterized by a Markovian dephasing process, which, in the non-adiabatic measurement protocol is… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regime, if time instants of measurements are not well defined and it significantly affects the desired transition probability, then the optimal solution will be to perform only one measurement at the avoided crossing time instant. This measurement will increase the transition probability from almost zero to 1/2, which agrees with the analysis of the quantum Zeno effect in the LZ system based on weak measurements [62] and the analysis of the LZ dynamics under strong dephasing [63,64]. Generally, the formalism of continuous or weak measurements can be used if the duration of measurements is comparable to or larger than the intervals between the optimal time instants [65][66][67][68][69].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this regime, if time instants of measurements are not well defined and it significantly affects the desired transition probability, then the optimal solution will be to perform only one measurement at the avoided crossing time instant. This measurement will increase the transition probability from almost zero to 1/2, which agrees with the analysis of the quantum Zeno effect in the LZ system based on weak measurements [62] and the analysis of the LZ dynamics under strong dephasing [63,64]. Generally, the formalism of continuous or weak measurements can be used if the duration of measurements is comparable to or larger than the intervals between the optimal time instants [65][66][67][68][69].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Finally we would like to note that the treatment of continuous measurements in terms of an SME also leads to a Lindblad-type master equation, see (52), similarly as obtained in various recent publications [61][62][63][64] which are concerned with the definition of work and heat and the quest for fluctuation theorems in open quantum 15 In [58,60] the dynamics in the strong measurement regime is referred to as the quantum Zeno effect. In our work we reserve the latter term for the complete freezing of unitary dynamics achieved by repeated projective measurements discussed in section 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Also note that for our choice of parameters in figures 8 and 9, we are also in the strong measurement regime of κ > ∆/ for the LZ problem where the coherent dynamics rate ∆ is trumped by the measurement backaction. It is known [58][59][60] that for the LZ system under continuous measurement, the behaviour of single trajectory solutions of (49) goes from near unitary at very small measurement strength to the so-called "random-telegraph" dynamics at the strong measurement κ > ∆/ regime (In [58,60] the dynamics in the strong measurement regime is referred to as the quantum Zeno effect. In our work we reserve the latter term for the complete freezing of unitary dynamics achieved by repeated projective measurements discussed in section 2).…”
Section: Continuous Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a two-level system, the loss of phase coherence between two states can be described by a Lindblad operator proportional to the difference between the projectors on such states. In the prototypical cases, hereafter labeled a and b, dephasing takes place between the states that form either the diabatic or the adiabatic basis [25]:…”
Section: Introduction -mentioning
confidence: 99%