Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2020
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language (Re)modelling: Towards Embodied Language Understanding

Abstract: While natural language understanding (NLU) is advancing rapidly, today's technology differs from human-like language understanding in fundamental ways, notably in its inferior efficiency, interpretability, and generalization. This work proposes an approach to representation and learning based on the tenets of embodied cognitive linguistics (ECL). According to ECL, natural language is inherently executable (like programming languages), driven by mental simulation and metaphoric mappings over hierarchical compos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al [208] proposed a MIND (Mental Imagery eNhanceD) module to model the dynamics of the environment and create objects for a better understanding of the implemented agent. Tamari et al [209] described that natural language in cognitive linguistics (ECL) is inherently executable and driven by metaphorical mappings and mental simulations to schemas learned through hierarchical organization and interaction.…”
Section: ) Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [208] proposed a MIND (Mental Imagery eNhanceD) module to model the dynamics of the environment and create objects for a better understanding of the implemented agent. Tamari et al [209] described that natural language in cognitive linguistics (ECL) is inherently executable and driven by metaphorical mappings and mental simulations to schemas learned through hierarchical organization and interaction.…”
Section: ) Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, as others have noted (Bender and Koller, 2020;Bisk et al, 2020;Tamari et al, 2020;Borghi et al, 2019), grounding goes beyond sensorimotor associations. Linguistic meaning is also grounded in social experience and interaction.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Most large language models (LMs) are trained on linguistic input alone. This approach may be fundamentally limited when it comes to language understanding (Bender and Koller, 2020;Bisk et al, 2020;Tamari et al, 2020), as the meaning of a word arguably depends on factors beyond which words it co-occurs with. In particular, humans appear to ground a word's meaning in a rich network of sensorimotor associations (Pulvermüller, 1999;Bergen and Feldman, 2008;Barsalou, 1999;Winter and Bergen, 2012;Barsalou, 2008;Glenberg and Kaschak, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fuller account of the constellation of factors involved in construal should also take seriously the grounded, situated nature of language use (Harnad, 1990;Kiros et al, 2018;Bender and Koller, 2020;Bisk et al, 2020). Frameworks motivated by the linguistic insights mentioned in §2 (such as the work on computational construction grammar referenced in §4) and by growing evidence of embodied simulations as the basis for meaning (Narayanan, 1999;Bergen and Chang, 2005;Feldman, 2006;Bergen, 2012;Tamari et al, 2020) are especially relevant lines of inquiry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%