Maltese Linguistics on the Danube 2020
DOI: 10.1515/9783110672268-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lanqas, negative concord and predicate negation in Maltese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And although languages and constructions show idiosyncrasies, there are similarities. Further study should take into account more languages and tie up the current findings with work on Greek (Barouni 2019), Maltese (Čéplö & Lucas 2020), Ossetic (Erschler & Volk 2011;Erschler 2013), and Turkish (Şener & İșsever 2003;Jeretič 2018). Interestingly, the latter studies only treat the more or less exceptional presence or absence of negators patterning with CoNegs, not the presence or absence of first CoNegs.…”
Section: Envoimentioning
confidence: 80%
“…And although languages and constructions show idiosyncrasies, there are similarities. Further study should take into account more languages and tie up the current findings with work on Greek (Barouni 2019), Maltese (Čéplö & Lucas 2020), Ossetic (Erschler & Volk 2011;Erschler 2013), and Turkish (Şener & İșsever 2003;Jeretič 2018). Interestingly, the latter studies only treat the more or less exceptional presence or absence of negators patterning with CoNegs, not the presence or absence of first CoNegs.…”
Section: Envoimentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The contrast between type-α1 and type-α2 ENC constructions may be seen as one between languages with negative concord and without. For details see, among others,Jeretič (2018),Čéplö & Lucas (2020),Van der Auwera (2021) andVan der Auwera et al (2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%