2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.04.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
103
2
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
103
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A European randomized trial of minimally invasive vs ODP demonstrated advantages to the minimally invasive approach with reduced time to functional recovery, operative blood loss, and frequency of delayed gastric emptying when compared to open surgery (ODP) 25 . Trials of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy vs OPD, however, have shown mixed results with two trials (from Spain and India) suggesting advantages, while a third from the Netherlands, terminated early due to concerns over increased 90‐day mortality in the laparoscopic cohort (10% vs 2%; relative risk = 4.9; 95% CI: 0.59‐40.44; P = .20) 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A European randomized trial of minimally invasive vs ODP demonstrated advantages to the minimally invasive approach with reduced time to functional recovery, operative blood loss, and frequency of delayed gastric emptying when compared to open surgery (ODP) 25 . Trials of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy vs OPD, however, have shown mixed results with two trials (from Spain and India) suggesting advantages, while a third from the Netherlands, terminated early due to concerns over increased 90‐day mortality in the laparoscopic cohort (10% vs 2%; relative risk = 4.9; 95% CI: 0.59‐40.44; P = .20) 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the recent Dutch Leopard-II study was terminated early due to increased mortality in the laparoscopic group [ 41 ]. A subsequent meta-analysis comparing open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy including only RCTs did not find any relevant advantage which would support the use of laparoscopy for this procedure [ 42 , 43 ]. However, the robotic approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy seems to offer a promising alternative to the open procedure with comparable postoperative outcomes and low mortality and should thus be evaluated in RCTs [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the incidence of PAAD is continuously increasing, and it is estimated that PAAD will become the second leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in the United States by 2030 (4). Pancreaticoduodenectomy is currently the only potentially curative therapeutic approach for PAAD (5,6). Most types of cancer can usually be cured at local stages by surgical resection (5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pancreaticoduodenectomy is currently the only potentially curative therapeutic approach for PAAD (5,6). Most types of cancer can usually be cured at local stages by surgical resection (5,6). However, resections of PAAD tumor usually fail to achieve long-term survival in most cases (5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%