1987
DOI: 10.1016/0361-9230(87)90025-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large and small medial frontal cortex lesions and spatial performance of the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular interest is the body of work in rodents involving reversal with a spatial component (Li & Shao, 1998;Wolf et al, 1987). Wolf et al (1987) found that lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in rats selectively impaired reversal of a position habit, but not acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of particular interest is the body of work in rodents involving reversal with a spatial component (Li & Shao, 1998;Wolf et al, 1987). Wolf et al (1987) found that lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in rats selectively impaired reversal of a position habit, but not acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest is the body of work in rodents involving reversal with a spatial component (Li & Shao, 1998;Wolf et al, 1987). Wolf et al (1987) found that lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in rats selectively impaired reversal of a position habit, but not acquisition. Li and Shao (1998) lesioned different parts of the mPFC in rats and found that the prelimbic area and the infralimbic area affected reversal learning, but not original discrimination learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the hippocampus is preferentially engaged during task acquisition, SS-13 BN animals exhibit improved acquisition compared to the SS strain. Cognitive flexibility is believed to primarily involve the prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Chudasama and Robbins 2003;Passetti et al 2002;Wolf et al 1987), which is not necessary for task acquisition (Lacroix et al 2002). Therefore, the partial rescue observed in the current study may be the result of regional differences in the impact of 13 BN introgression on neural function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Nevertheless, the needle was inserted by hand and not stereotactically, and this probably added to the variability. There are several experimental techniques available to produce lesions in the cortex, such as aspiration through glass pipettes 14,15,35 or electrolysis by using Teflon-coated electrodes. 13 The aspiration/ablation technique also creates a rather variable lesion.…”
Section: Methodological Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%