2012
DOI: 10.1130/g33318.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large normal-sense displacement on the South Tibetan fault system in the eastern Himalaya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The High Himalayan Crystalline complex is bounded to the north by large-scale low-angle normal-sense faults and shear zones of the South Tibetan fault system (Hodges et al 1998;Dèzes et al 1999;Searle 1999;Cooper et al 2012). These faults resemble core complex detachments, and clearly played an important role in exhuming the metamorphic rocks beneath them.…”
Section: What Is a Metamorphic Core Complex?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The High Himalayan Crystalline complex is bounded to the north by large-scale low-angle normal-sense faults and shear zones of the South Tibetan fault system (Hodges et al 1998;Dèzes et al 1999;Searle 1999;Cooper et al 2012). These faults resemble core complex detachments, and clearly played an important role in exhuming the metamorphic rocks beneath them.…”
Section: What Is a Metamorphic Core Complex?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No identifiable stratigraphic offset below or within the TH section [ Long and McQuarrie , 2010], combined with minimal to diffuse changes in pressure or temperature along potential structural boundaries [ Kellett and Grujic , 2012], makes documenting the exact amount of displacement on the STDl, and how this amount may change along strike, difficult. Normal‐sense displacement estimates on this structure range from 20 to 65+ km [ Long and McQuarrie , 2010; Cooper et al , 2012].…”
Section: The Himalayan Thrust Belt In Bhutanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Geologic map from Cooper et al . [], modified in the Mount Jomolhari (Jh)‐Mount Jichu Drake (JD) range where the STFS is shown at a higher elevation than previously mapped. In this interpretation, the basal STFS detachment forms a continuous low‐angle surface separating isolated erosional remnants of the TSS in its hanging wall from high‐grade metamorphic rocks of the Chekha and GHS in its footwall.…”
Section: Structural Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been proposed that the basal STFS detachment is a back thrust, kinematically linked to the north vergent Great Counter thrust system in southern Tibet [ Webb et al , , ; Yin , ; Yin et al , , ]. However, minimum constraints on STFS displacement of 65–170 km [ Cooper et al , , ; Law et al , ] are inconsistent with the limited displacement expected on such back thrusts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%