1995
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00059-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late effects toxicity scoring: The soma scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
64
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective SOMA scales (0 -4) (Pavy et al, 1995) were used to score for fibrosis, atrophy and telangiectasia severity during a detailed physical examination and represent separate phenotypic measures of late normal tissue damage. The SOMA scores of 1 represent subtle examiner-dependent changes that are inconclusive and in this study are either excluded or included in the group of patients that show no signs (SOMA 0) of a particular injury phenotype.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective SOMA scales (0 -4) (Pavy et al, 1995) were used to score for fibrosis, atrophy and telangiectasia severity during a detailed physical examination and represent separate phenotypic measures of late normal tissue damage. The SOMA scores of 1 represent subtle examiner-dependent changes that are inconclusive and in this study are either excluded or included in the group of patients that show no signs (SOMA 0) of a particular injury phenotype.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Late Effects of Normal Tissue-Subjective Objective Management Analytical (LENT-SOMA) scale allows comparison between individuals of the clinical perception of injury, the patient's perception of the injury, the medical management required and the underlying pathological process (Pavy et al, 1995). A score of 0-4 is given to each of the LENT-SOMA tests, and the sum of the individual scores for each patient a measure of overall tissue damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the CTC Version 2, the Dische system, Franco-Italian Glossary, UCLA Cancer Index and RTOG/EORTC have all been shown to have shortcomings (Shakespeare et al, 1998;Yeoh et al, 2000;Anacak et al, 2001;Livsey et al, 2002;Trotti, 2002). More recently, the Late Effects Normal Tissue (LENT) SOMA questionnaire (Pavy et al, 1995;Rubin et al, 1995) has been proposed, and while overcoming many of the problems of earlier questionnaires, it is much more complex and requires a lengthy, structured interview with a patient, which is often not feasible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severity of the adverse reactions was scored for each patient using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 2.0 (6), the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) (7), and the decrease in the white blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PLT) counts. Other widely used scoring systems include those of the RTOG and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, and the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (8). These scales include four separate elements, representing subjective, objective, management and analytical evaluation of injury (Table II).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%