A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9781444320114.ch24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Law and Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an endeavour has two objectives: 1) to produce knowledge about how the institutions of prohibition operate and with what effects, and 2) to uncover the ways in which the institutions of prohibition disempower certain groups while empowering others, and with what harms and disadvantages (cf. Tamanaha, 2010).…”
Section: Notes Towards a Critical Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an endeavour has two objectives: 1) to produce knowledge about how the institutions of prohibition operate and with what effects, and 2) to uncover the ways in which the institutions of prohibition disempower certain groups while empowering others, and with what harms and disadvantages (cf. Tamanaha, 2010).…”
Section: Notes Towards a Critical Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…als grundlegende Texte Griffiths (1986);Merry (1988);Berman (2009);Zumbansen (2010). 282 Tamanaha (2010), 382 ff.…”
Section: Rezeptionunclassified
“…Tamanaha 2009). As Chambliss and Seidman clearly saw, however, there is no point in a concept of ''law'' so broad that it applies to every kind of social norm-we might just has well refer to social norms and forget about law.…”
Section: Legal Pluralism and The Concept Of Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%