2010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004015.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases

Abstract: LHWs provide promising benefits in promoting immunisation uptake and breastfeeding, improving TB treatment outcomes, and reducing child morbidity and mortality when compared to usual care. For other health issues, evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions about the effects of LHWs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
761
1
18

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 762 publications
(816 citation statements)
references
References 217 publications
15
761
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Eng and colleagues (1997) have conceptualized nonspecialist health workers on a spectrum from the “natural helper” (unpaid community members) at one end to the “para‐professional” (paid workers with minimal qualifications, trained, and demonstrating acceptable levels of standardized competencies) at the other. Community health workers have demonstrated effectiveness in increasing access to care (Swider, 2002; Viswanathan et al., 2010), for example, promoting immunization uptake and breastfeeding, improving tuberculosis treatment outcomes, and reducing child morbidity and mortality (Lewin et al., 2010). In the field of mental health, there is robust evidence that lay counselors (a person without professional qualification in mental health care) can be trained to deliver PT effectively for people with depressive and anxiety disorders in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC) (van Ginneken et al., 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eng and colleagues (1997) have conceptualized nonspecialist health workers on a spectrum from the “natural helper” (unpaid community members) at one end to the “para‐professional” (paid workers with minimal qualifications, trained, and demonstrating acceptable levels of standardized competencies) at the other. Community health workers have demonstrated effectiveness in increasing access to care (Swider, 2002; Viswanathan et al., 2010), for example, promoting immunization uptake and breastfeeding, improving tuberculosis treatment outcomes, and reducing child morbidity and mortality (Lewin et al., 2010). In the field of mental health, there is robust evidence that lay counselors (a person without professional qualification in mental health care) can be trained to deliver PT effectively for people with depressive and anxiety disorders in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC) (van Ginneken et al., 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHVs thus play an important role in helping to achieve the universal health coverage and sustainable development goals reported by many researchers. 4,[11][12][13][14][15][16] To these would be added emergency and data management tasks, focusing on volunteers with altruistic values. Finkelstein, and his co-workers demonstrated that the fulfillment of motives was a good predictor of volunteer tasks and longevity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[11][12][13][14][15][16] CHVs help increase access to, and facilitate the use of healthcare services during medical cases as tuberculosis, immunization and family planning programs, particularly in populations with limited access to healthcare facilities. 17 In complying with the expectations and having received sufficient investment and support, community health workers (CHWs) show great potential towards strengthening the current situation of health systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of evidence 5 that suggests lay CHWs are highly effective at engaging the population for chronic disease management, 6 screening services, 7 neonatal mortality 8 and child and maternal health. 9 In the Family Health Programme, CHWs are lay members of the community, but are also full-time members of the health unit. Each CHW is assigned to 150 households in geographically delineated microareas within the larger catchment area -again these micro-areas have no overlap or gaps between them.…”
Section: The Family Health Programmementioning
confidence: 99%