2020
DOI: 10.31181/oresta2003087b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LBWA – Z-MAIRCA Model Supporting Decision Making in the Army

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LBWA method requires smaller number of pairwise criteria comparisons and has a rational and logical mathematical algorithm (Zizovic and Pamucar 2019 ). From the group of subjective criteria weighting methods, LBWA stands out due to the following advantages (Bozanic et al 2020 ): i) small number of comparisons; ii) algorithm does not become complicated with increase in number of criteria, thus making it suitable for complex MCDM problems; and iii) it allows DMs a logical algorithm to present their preferences while prioritizing criteria. This eliminates inconsistencies in expert preferences.…”
Section: Proposed Decision Making Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LBWA method requires smaller number of pairwise criteria comparisons and has a rational and logical mathematical algorithm (Zizovic and Pamucar 2019 ). From the group of subjective criteria weighting methods, LBWA stands out due to the following advantages (Bozanic et al 2020 ): i) small number of comparisons; ii) algorithm does not become complicated with increase in number of criteria, thus making it suitable for complex MCDM problems; and iii) it allows DMs a logical algorithm to present their preferences while prioritizing criteria. This eliminates inconsistencies in expert preferences.…”
Section: Proposed Decision Making Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whereà is a Fuzzy restriction on the values that X A can take, andR is the reliability of valueà [41]. In fact, the probability ofà value is estimated byR.…”
Section: Basic Preliminaries Of Z Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is one of the widely used methods to evaluate and rank combat tasks by using various evaluation methods. For example, an evaluation method combining the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and fuzzy mathematics [33][34][35], Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method in dynamic environment [36][37][38], Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method which is less affected by the subjective factors of decision makers [39][40][41], and entropy method combined with the above method [42,43], etc.…”
Section: Moeas For Operational Task Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%