2020
DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf anatomical variation in Desmos Lour. and Dasymaschalon (Hook. f. & Thomson) Dalla Torre & Harms species (Annonaceae)

Abstract: Abstract. Nikmah IA, Rugayah R, Chikmawati T. 2020. Leaf anatomical variation in Desmos Lour. and Dasymaschalon (Hook. f. & Thomson) Dalla Torre & Harms species (Annonaceae). Biodiversitas 21: 3317-3330. The relationships between Desmos and Dasymaschalon are debated for along time. Those two genera have high morphological similarities, especially in their generative character (moniliform monocarps). Therefore, sterile specimens of Desmos are difficult to be distinguished from Dasymaschalon. Leaf anatom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For observations, light microscopic (Model: Nikon Eclipse E100, magnification of 10 x for ocular and a 40 x for objective) were used. Random observations were conducted at three different microscopic fields on both the abaxial and adaxial epidermis leaf surfaces (Nikmah et al 2020). There were ten measured quantitative leaf anatomical characters included cystolith density adaxial, cystolith length adaxial, cystolith width adaxial, cystolith length:width ratio adaxial, glandular trichomes density adaxial, cystolith density abaxial, cystolith length abaxial, cystolith width abaxial, cystolith length:width ratio abaxial, and glandular trichome density abaxial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For observations, light microscopic (Model: Nikon Eclipse E100, magnification of 10 x for ocular and a 40 x for objective) were used. Random observations were conducted at three different microscopic fields on both the abaxial and adaxial epidermis leaf surfaces (Nikmah et al 2020). There were ten measured quantitative leaf anatomical characters included cystolith density adaxial, cystolith length adaxial, cystolith width adaxial, cystolith length:width ratio adaxial, glandular trichomes density adaxial, cystolith density abaxial, cystolith length abaxial, cystolith width abaxial, cystolith length:width ratio abaxial, and glandular trichome density abaxial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of anatomical features in the identification and delimitation of plant groups is widely accepted (Aworinde et al 2013;Awomukwu et al 2015;Syaheera et al 2015;Nwachukwu et al 2016;Budel et al 2018;Migacz et al 2018;Nikmah et al 2020;Paul and Chowdhury 2021;Zakaria et al 2022). The leaf anatomy characters are considered the second most important characters after flowers and fruits in taxonomic studies (Chauhan and Daniel 2011;Muzzazinah et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study of morphological and anatomical markers has been widely studied in other tropical plants such as Desmos sp. (Nikmah et al 2020) and Cucumis sp. (Pratami et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the same species but having two different kinds of characteristics, it can be said that these characters are included in the subspecies distinguishing features. Determination of subspecies differentiating features can be supported by morphological, anatomical, molecular, or metabolite approaches (Yuliamita 2014;Harahap and Ardiarini 2018;Zhang et al 2018;Pratami et al 2019;Satrio et al 2019;Nikmah et al 2020;Fendiyanto et al 2020). Determining the distinguishing features of the arillus in S. sumatrana has its challenges due to different physiological factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%