2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Segment via Cut-and-Paste

Abstract: This paper presents a weakly-supervised approach to object instance segmentation. Starting with known or predicted object bounding boxes, we learn object masks by playing a game of cut-and-paste in an adversarial learning setup. A mask generator takes a detection box and Faster R-CNN features, and constructs a segmentation mask that is used to cut-and-paste the object into a new image location. The discriminator tries to distinguish between real objects, and those cut and pasted via the generator, giving a lea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thanks to low annotation costs of weak labels, approaches in this category can utilize more training images of diverse objects, although they have to compensate for missing information in weak labels. For instance segmentation, bounding boxes have been widely used as weak labels since they provide every property of objects except shape [24,44]. However, it is still costly to obtain box labels for a variety of classes in a large number of images as they are manually annotated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to low annotation costs of weak labels, approaches in this category can utilize more training images of diverse objects, although they have to compensate for missing information in weak labels. For instance segmentation, bounding boxes have been widely used as weak labels since they provide every property of objects except shape [24,44]. However, it is still costly to obtain box labels for a variety of classes in a large number of images as they are manually annotated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining different sources of synthetic data with real data, and then generating a realistic composition of the both, has been successfully applied to various tasks, such as semisupervised foreground-background segmentation (Remez, Huang, and Brown 2018;Alhaija et al 2018;Dwibedi, Misra, and Hebert 2017), object detection (Dvornik, Mairal, and Schmid 2018;Dwibedi, Misra, and Hebert 2017) or 3d object pose estimation (Alhaija et al 2018). The two cut-and-paste methods (Dwibedi, Misra, and Hebert 2017;Remez, Huang, and Brown 2018) use simple blending techniques, and only for the foreground object, while we propose to learn a blending for both the background and foreground, accordingly. Note that while (Alhaija et al 2018) and (Dwibedi, Misra, and Hebert 2017) take the 3d geometry of the scene into account, they only consider 3d rigid objects.…”
Section: General Data Augmentation Through Image Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods typically rely on bottom-up segment proposals [6] [7]. In contrast with this approach, [8] proposes an adversarial scheme that learns to segment without using any object proposal technique. Although these works tackle weakly-supervised instance segmentation, their weak supervision consists in using bounding boxes, thus their main challenge resides in how to separate the foreground from the background within a bounding box.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%