2019
DOI: 10.21799/frbp.wp.2019.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaving Households Behind: Institutional Investors and the U.S.Housing Recovery

Abstract: Ten years after the mortgage crisis, the U.S. housing market has rebounded significantly with house prices now near the peak achieved during the boom. Homeownership rates, on the other hand, have continued to decline. We reconcile the two phenomena by documenting the rising presence of institutional investors in this market. Our analysis makes use of housing transaction data. By exploiting heterogeneity in zip codes' exposure to the First Look program instituted by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that affected inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, only about one quarter of SFRs were owned in portfolios of 10 or more properties in 1996 (Mills et al 2019). However, this assumption changed in the aftermath of the housing crisis, as rapidly declining prices for single-family homes (see Figure 1), mounting foreclosures, and limited access to mortgage credit increased demand for rentals (Amherst Capital Management 2016;Eisfeldt and Demers 2018;Fields 2018;Immergluck 2018;Lambie-Hanson, Li, and Slonkosky 2019;Mills et al 2019;Molina 2016;Reid, Sanchez-Moyano, and Galante 2018;Schnure 2014). These dynamics enticed sophisticated Wall Street investors to enter the SFR industry in 2009 which prompted observers to identify SFRs as a new, institutional asset class (Amherst Capital Management 2016;Fields 2018;Mills et al 2019).…”
Section: Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, only about one quarter of SFRs were owned in portfolios of 10 or more properties in 1996 (Mills et al 2019). However, this assumption changed in the aftermath of the housing crisis, as rapidly declining prices for single-family homes (see Figure 1), mounting foreclosures, and limited access to mortgage credit increased demand for rentals (Amherst Capital Management 2016;Eisfeldt and Demers 2018;Fields 2018;Immergluck 2018;Lambie-Hanson, Li, and Slonkosky 2019;Mills et al 2019;Molina 2016;Reid, Sanchez-Moyano, and Galante 2018;Schnure 2014). These dynamics enticed sophisticated Wall Street investors to enter the SFR industry in 2009 which prompted observers to identify SFRs as a new, institutional asset class (Amherst Capital Management 2016;Fields 2018;Mills et al 2019).…”
Section: Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper belongs to a vast literature focusing on the interactions of financial frictions, the housing market, and macroeconomic aggregates. In particular, this literature highlights the importance of house prices and collateral constraints in amplifying recessions (see, e.g., Iacoviello (2005), Iacoviello and Pavan (2013), Favilukis et al (2013), Liu et al (2013), Mian et al (2013), Kaplan et al (2016), andLambie-Hanson et al (2019), among others). We complement this literature by studying the contrasting responses in investment homeownership across prime and subprime borrowers during recessions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there has been a substantial increase in the number of renter households and demand for rental housing (Joint Center for Housing Studies 2017b). Investors in residential real estate have played an increasingly important role in supplying this housing, particularly through the acquisition of large numbers of single-family homes repossessed during the foreclosure crisis (Lambie-Hanson, Li, and Slonkosky 2019). The number of single-family rental units grew by 2.8 million between 2005 and 2015 to an estimated 14.6 million total (U.S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%