Length Changes in the Interosseous Membrane During Forearm Rotation: A 3-Dimensional Study In Vivo

Luo, Chunbing; Sun, Yucheng; Bian, Haoyu; Liu, Hua; Liu, Tingting; Tan, Jun

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.06.007

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this study, we created a virtual IOM and analysed its in vivo dynamics. The CB showed minimal change in length during rotation, consistent with previous reports 39 , 40 , but smaller than that of the other components, suggesting that CB is a main stabilizer of IOM during forearm rotation 39 . The length change in the POC (3%) was lower than the values reported in the previous study (14%) 40 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reproduction of forearm rotation dynamic using intensity-based biplane 2D–3D registration matching method

Shiode,

Miyamura,

Kazui

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to reproduce and analyse the in vivo dynamic rotational motion of the forearm and to clarify forearm motion involvement and the anatomical function of the interosseous membrane (IOM). The dynamic forearm rotational motion of the radius and ulna was analysed in vivo using a novel image-matching method based on fluoroscopic and computed tomography images for intensity-based biplane two-dimensional–three-dimensional registration. Twenty upper limbs from 10 healthy volunteers were included in this study. The mean range of forearm rotation was 150 ± 26° for dominant hands and 151 ± 18° for non-dominant hands, with no significant difference observed between the two. The radius was most proximal to the maximum pronation relative to the ulna, moved distally toward 60% of the rotation range from maximum pronation, and again proximally toward supination. The mean axial translation of the radius relative to the ulna during forearm rotation was 1.8 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.9 mm for dominant and non-dominant hands, respectively. The lengths of the IOM components, excluding the central band (CB), changed rotation. The transverse CB length was maximal at approximately 50% of the rotation range from maximum pronation. Summarily, this study describes a detailed method for evaluating in vivo dynamic forearm motion and provides valuable insights into forearm kinematics and IOM function.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…The length change in the POC (3%) was lower than the values reported in the previous study (14%) 40 . The DOB (4–5%) ranges were similar to those reported previously (4%) 39 , 40 . The difference between the findings of the present and previous studies may be attributed to the measurements under dynamic and static conditions.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Reproduction of forearm rotation dynamic using intensity-based biplane 2D–3D registration matching method

Shiode,

Miyamura,

Kazui

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This study found no obvious change in the length of the DOB during forearm rotation, which is consistent with the conclusions of Moritomo et al (2009), who proposed that that the origin of the DOB at the ulna was exactly along the rotation axis of the DRUJ. Luo et al (2022) found that the length of the DOB was longest in the neutral position, when they measured the length in a few positions during the forearm rotation. Using four-dimensional CT, we were able to fully display the motion tracks of the radius and ulna during the forearm rotation process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(2009), who proposed that that the origin of the DOB at the ulna was exactly along the rotation axis of the DRUJ. Luo et al. (2022) found that the length of the DOB was longest in the neutral position, when they measured the length in a few positions during the forearm rotation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%